Hi Armin,
But IMHO the main slow part that should be optimized (probably by
being rewritten from scratch) is the correspondance between the proxy
PyObject structures and the real PyPy objects, which is exactly the
part that interests you too. It should be possible at least to cope
with only one
Hi Wim,
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:10 AM, wrote:
> If I understand correctly what you describe above, then perhaps giving
> the "PyPyObject by pointer" as payload to the PyObject could help, too.
Yes: so far, most PyObjects are small structures containing just the
refcount and the cpyext-ified ty
> If the goal
> is "only" to pass around PyObjects as black boxes, as fast as
> reasonably possible, then the easiest route would be to not use cpyext
> at all, but instead try to come up with your own mapping logic. This
> looks quite easier for experimentation purposes. And if you end up
> wit
I have started a branch to support app level finding functions by
ordinals: win-ordinal
I would be happy for any comments as it progresses. Currently, I have
added tests and ordinal handling to rlib/libffi.py and module/_ffi
if I run tests one at a time, they all pass, but running in one pass
