Hi Tuom,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Tuom Larsen wrote:
> Please, let me rephrase my question: currently I use `[:]` because it
> is faster in CPython (0.131 usec vs 0.269 usec per loop). I almost
> don't mind changing it to `list()` because of PyPy but I was wondering
> what do PyPy develop
http://pointersgonewild.com/2015/09/24/basic-block-versioning-my-best-result-yet/
HTH
Niki
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
Hi Armin,
thanks a lot, both for the explanation and the fix! I will try it soon.
Have a nice day!
Tuom
PS: The speed difference came from larger piece of code, which I tried
to reproduce in "minimal viable test case". Hence that `timeit`, where
it showed up as well. But in any case, thanks a l
Hi Niki,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Niki Spahiev wrote:
> http://pointersgonewild.com/2015/09/24/basic-block-versioning-my-best-result-yet/
It would look cool if it was 2005. To me, in 2015, it sounds
completely outdated... I'm sure that PyPy or V8 are both able to
optimize away most ty
On 29/09/15 12:40, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi Niki,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Niki Spahiev wrote:
http://pointersgonewild.com/2015/09/24/basic-block-versioning-my-best-result-yet/
It would look cool if it was 2005. To me, in 2015, it sounds
completely outdated... I'm sure that PyPy or V8
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
>> It would look cool if it was 2005. To me, in 2015, it sounds
>> completely outdated...
>
> One thing that's very cool in BBV that I'm not aware of any other JIT
> doing is to have type-specialized entry points for uninlinable met
On 29 September 2015 at 21:18, Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> One thing that's very cool in BBV that I'm not aware of any other JIT
> doing is to have type-specialized entry points for uninlinable methods.
> Ie if a method is not inlined then the caller calls a type specialized
> entry point with al
