Re: [pypy-dev] Mercurial "general delta"

2016-12-04 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
can we somehow make it new thing on the bb? that would mean download gets smaller On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi all, > > A quick note for people that have a PyPy repo since years and are > using it like me without ever re-cloning from Bitbucket: the format of > modern mer

Re: [pypy-dev] Mercurial "general delta"

2016-12-04 Thread Armin Rigo
Hi Maciej, On 4 December 2016 at 12:27, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > can we somehow make it new thing on the bb? that would mean download > gets smaller Is that true? Armin ___ pypy-dev mailing list pypy-dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: [pypy-dev] Mercurial "general delta"

2016-12-04 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
I don't know :-) let's see On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Maciej, > > On 4 December 2016 at 12:27, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> can we somehow make it new thing on the bb? that would mean download >> gets smaller > > Is that true? > > > Armin

Re: [pypy-dev] Mercurial "general delta"

2016-12-04 Thread Maciej Fijalkowski
as far as I understood the answer on #mercurial, it seems to be "no". If the only effect is that it uses less space on bitbucket servers then I presume it's not our problem On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > I don't know :-) > > let's see > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:28 P

Re: [pypy-dev] Mercurial "general delta"

2016-12-04 Thread Ronny Pfannschmidt
Hi, when i tried the same on the pypy repo a few years back, the only potential solution would have been to do a complete strip/removal of the server side history before re-uploading from a generaldelta transformed repository. (im not sure if this still would work) if i recall correctly we didnt