Yes, that's true, but I believe that such decisions should offered to the
programmers rather than dictated. There is also a whole other discussion on
* how/where optimizations/transformations could be recorded
* how tracebacks could be handled
* debugging optimized code
But here I wanted to foc
On 10 July 2017 at 11:10, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> In looking at Python bytecode over the years, I've noticed that it does very
> little to no traditional static-compiler optimization. Specifically:
>
>
> Yes, over the years more compiler optimization has been done but it's still
> pretty sparse.
