[pypy-dev] pypy.org : Updating the current pypy.org webpage - removing yatiblog README and adding new nikola system instructions ?

2020-03-30 Thread mark doerr
Hello pypy.org webmasters, while discussing with Armin Rigo the update of the documentation of sandbox-2 on pypy.org, I realised, that the README (in the root dir of the pypy.org repo) is still pointing to the old yatiblog pages (source/README - which contains the old yatiblog instructions).

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy.org : Updating the current pypy.org webpage - removing yatiblog README and adding new nikola system instructions ?

2020-03-30 Thread Matti Picus
On 29/3/20 11:43 pm, mark doerr wrote: Hello pypy.org webmasters, while discussing with Armin Rigo the update of the documentation of sandbox-2 on pypy.org, I realised, that the README (in the root dir of the pypy.org repo) is still

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy.org : Updating the current pypy.org webpage - removing yatiblog README and adding new nikola system instructions ? sphinx vs. nikola

2020-03-30 Thread mark doerr
You're welcome, Matti, thanks for you fast reply. I will make a proposal for an update. Just one question/comment, since you are at the very beginning of your new repository: On our SiLA python repository ( https://gitlab.com/SiLA2/sila_python ) we are just using sphinx to generate the gitLAB s

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy.org : Updating the current pypy.org webpage - removing yatiblog README and adding new nikola system instructions ? sphinx vs. nikola

2020-03-30 Thread Matti Picus
Those pages do look nice, and are very similar to doc.python.org or doc.pypy.org (but with a nicer theme). However this repo renders www.pypy.org, which is parallel to www.python.org, which is the "non-developer front page" of pypy and python. Your p

Re: [pypy-dev] pypy.org : Updating the current pypy.org webpage - removing yatiblog README and adding new nikola system instructions ? sphinx vs. nikola

2020-03-30 Thread mark doerr
I see, Matti, thanks for explaining the decision. These are valid arguments using nikola (the blog post part I was not aware of). Using the CI of heptapod might be really worth to have a closer look into (that also might reduce errors, since everything relies only on one service rather than

Re: [pypy-dev] [Python-ideas] Explicitly defining a string buffer object (aka StringIO += operator)

2020-03-30 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:58:32 -0700 Brett Cannon wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:58 AM Paul Sokolovsky > wrote: > > > [SNIP] > > > > 1. Succumb to applying the same mis-optimization for string type as > > CPython3. (With the understanding that for speed-optimized projects, > > implem

Re: [pypy-dev] [Python-ideas] Re: Explicitly defining a string buffer object (aka StringIO += operator)

2020-03-30 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:24:02AM -0700, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas wrote: > On Mar 30, 2020, at 10:01, Brett Cannon wrote: [talking about string concatenation] > > I don't think characterizing this as a "mis-optimization" is fair. [...] > Yes. A big part of the reason there’s so much us

Re: [pypy-dev] [Python-ideas] Re: Explicitly defining a string buffer object (aka StringIO += operator)

2020-03-30 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas wrote: > On Mar 30, 2020, at 12:00, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > > Roughly speaking, to support efficient appending, one need to > > be ready to over-allocate string storage, and maintain bookkeeping for > > this. Another known