On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, at 8:50:20 AM, "Alexander Petrov"
wrote:
> [snip]
> So at this time I didn't come to some kind of decision about PyPy.
>
> On one hand in most of the cases with straitforward code/algorithms
> and "common" syntax constructs there was significant speed
> improvement
On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 10:27:24 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:25 AM, David Fraser
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, July 20, 2011, at 8:50:20 AM, "Alexander Petrov"
> > wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> So
case is a web application
server - it would be nice if the first N page views weren't terribly slow as
they are now)
Cheers
David
--
David Fraser
St James Software
___
pypy-dev mailing list
pypy-dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
On Friday, August 19, 2011 at 3:32:07 PM, "Armin Rigo" wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:56 PM, David Fraser
> wrote:
> > The pypy JIT takes a while to work out which parts of python code
> > need optimization etc, and only after that phase d
On Friday, August 19, 2011 at 3:40:24 PM, "Harald Armin Massa"
wrote:
> >> The pypy JIT takes a while to work out which parts of python code
> >> need optimization etc,
>
> > No, this is not really doable. The JIT writes explicitly in the
> > assembler the address of a ton of constants.
>
> co
I'm not using Django but another web platform; I've found some speedup using
pypy after the JIT has kicked in, but it did require some profiling and
adjusting of my code. Why not give pypy a go?
- Original Message -
From: "Andy"
To: pypy-dev@python.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 20
I'm hoping to get that better. I haven't
monitored memory usage specifically
Cheers
David
- Original Message -
From: "Andy"
To: "David Fraser"
Cc: pypy-dev@python.org
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 5:01:25 PM
Subject: Re: [pypy-dev] Is PyPy approp
On Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 10:38:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Antonio Cuni
> wrote:
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On 07/09/11 16:43, Jorge de Jesus wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi to all
> >>
> >> I've benchmark/profile some code (PyWPS API) and PyPy-c is 2/3x
> >> ti
On Thursday, September 8, 2011 at 12:58:54 PM, Jorge de Jesus
wrote:
> Hi to all
>
> Thank you for all the answers concerning the topic.
>
> The deepcopy testing script in issue 767 [1], is working faster in PyPy
> than in CPython, but deepcopy is run on a list of numbers.
>
> BUT, PyWPS runs
You may also want to try pg8000; this is a pure-Python driver that works on
Windows
On Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 6:08:51 PM, "Костя Лопухин"
wrote:
> Hi! I did not test it on Windows, there may be problems with
> installation (searching for postgres header files, the config is not
> very sm
10 matches
Mail list logo
