We have this book and have found it to be an excellent guide,
Tony
-Original Message-
From: pyqt-boun...@riverbankcomputing.com [mailto:pyqt-
boun...@riverbankcomputing.com] On Behalf Of Mark Summerfield
Sent: 11 December 2012 09:36
To: pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com
Subject: Re:
Phil has maintained PyQt uninterrupted for (I think) 8 or 9 years. He
tends to fix bugs within a day. Qt is much better than wx in general,
and more widely used. I'd go for Qt/PyQt every time,
Regards
Tony
-Original Message-
From: pyqt-boun...@riverbankcomputing.com [mailto:pyqt-
I can work around the issue here by either (1) redeclaring in sip all
base
class 'virtual' methods in all the derived classes
That's not a work around - that's what you are supposed to do, ie. tell
SIP about all the implementations.
Ah - ok, I've been looking at the sip qt wrappings as
I'm using SIP to wrap a large C++ library
I wonder which one that is... :)
You guessed it :-). I have to say that SIP is helping greatly in the wrapping
process and I'm genuinely impressed at how much functionality it's bringing.
So it's not a bug, it's a
conscious decision to do it
Hi Phil
I'm using SIP to wrap a large C++ library and am very impressed with the
results so far - you've got an annotation for most of the use cases I'm
interested in. However, I think I've found a bug. I've copied in below
my own 'description to self' of the problem, if it is not sufficient
