On Sun 29-Apr-07, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On 29/04/2007 6.25, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Right, the motivation for the Qt.py package is simply convenience for
porting PyQt3 code. Which doesn't mean you should use it in new PyQt4
programs. Using something like this creates enough convience while
On 30/04/2007 9.11, Mark Summerfield wrote:
But I agree with the general point that using import * is reasonable
when you have a large library like PyQt4---providing that library has
sensible export behaviour. For example, I _assume_ that the PyQt4
libraries will only export things with names
On Monday 30 April 2007 14:50:29 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On 30/04/2007 9.11, Mark Summerfield wrote:
But I agree with the general point that using import * is reasonable
when you have a large library like PyQt4---providing that library has
sensible export behaviour. For example, I _assume_
On Sunday 29 April 2007 5:25 am, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.04.07 21:13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 28.04.07 23:31:53, Pradnyesh Sawant wrote:
Hello,
I've written a small pyqt4 code, which on running on an ubuntu 6.10
system gives
On 29/04/2007 6.25, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Right, the motivation for the Qt.py package is simply convenience for
porting PyQt3 code. Which doesn't mean you should use it in new PyQt4
programs. Using something like this creates enough convience while
preserving a clean global namespace:
from
On 29.04.07 11:05:52, Phil Thompson wrote:
On Sunday 29 April 2007 5:25 am, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 28.04.07 21:13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 28.04.07 23:31:53, Pradnyesh Sawant wrote:
Hello,
I've written a small pyqt4 code,
On 28.04.07 21:13:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 28.04.07 23:31:53, Pradnyesh Sawant wrote:
Hello,
I've written a small pyqt4 code, which on running on an ubuntu 6.10
system gives me the foll error:
$ python2.4 updLbl.py
Traceback
