On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:05:57 -0500, Brandon Craig Rhodes
bran...@rhodesmill.org wrote:
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
Why not trigger the timer from the loadFinished signal. That way, you
get the best of both worlds ;)
That's a good idea! I promise to try it, just as soon as I
On Tuesday 30 November 2010, 10:43:35 Phil Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:05:57 -0500, Brandon Craig Rhodes
bran...@rhodesmill.org wrote:
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
Why not trigger the timer from the loadFinished signal. That way,
you get the best of both worlds ;)
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
Brandon, forgot to add:
I bet, that the simplest version (just the first webview.load,
findAll, and click) as C++ version will also crash in a similar way,
pointing to some uncaught race between the operating theads. It would
be a very good idea to
On Tuesday 30 November 2010, 16:09:09 Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
Brandon, forgot to add:
I bet, that the simplest version (just the first webview.load,
findAll, and click) as C++ version will also crash in a similar
way, pointing to some
I think that there is a bright future in using PyQt4 with a QWebView
object for writing basic web tests, and for web automation. My early
experiments suggest that it is a much simpler and faster solution, when
one needs web page browsing with JavaScript enabled, than a heavyweight
technique like
On Monday 29 November 2010, 16:54:42 Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
I think that there is a bright future in using PyQt4 with a QWebView
object for writing basic web tests, and for web automation. My early
experiments suggest that it is a much simpler and faster solution,
when one needs web page
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
From what I can see, you're missing fundamental concepts of the
asynchronous nature of QtWebView. You should control your test flow
with signals, instead of a timer, e.g.:
# you need to wait for finishing the load
On Monday 29 November 2010, 18:30:39 Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
From what I can see, you're missing fundamental concepts of the
asynchronous nature of QtWebView. You should control your test flow
with signals, instead of a timer, e.g.:
# you
Hans-Peter Jansen h...@urpla.net writes:
Why not trigger the timer from the loadFinished signal. That way, you
get the best of both worlds ;)
That's a good idea! I promise to try it, just as soon as I can stop the
script from giving me a segmentation fault every time that I run it. :-)
If no
Il giorno gio, 05/08/2010 alle 03.10 -0400, Luke Campagnola ha scritto:
I believe I have run into a class of bugs in PyQt4. I originally found
that QSpinBox.lineEdit() returns a QLineEdit instance which does not
maintain its reference count properly after the original QSpinBox is
deleted.
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:53, Mailing List SVR li...@svrinformatica.itwrote:
Il giorno gio, 05/08/2010 alle 03.10 -0400, Luke Campagnola ha scritto:
$ python
from PyQt4.QtGui import *
a = QApplication([])
s = QSpinBox()
l = s.lineEdit()
del s
l.text()
Segmentation fault
I believe I have run into a class of bugs in PyQt4. I originally found that
QSpinBox.lineEdit() returns a QLineEdit instance which does not maintain its
reference count properly after the original QSpinBox is deleted. Thus it is
possible to either 1) have uncollectable LineEdits lingering in
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 03:10:50 -0400, Luke Campagnola
lcamp...@email.unc.edu
wrote:
I believe I have run into a class of bugs in PyQt4. I originally found
that
QSpinBox.lineEdit() returns a QLineEdit instance which does not maintain
its
reference count properly after the original QSpinBox is
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 03:43, Phil Thompson p...@riverbankcomputing.comwrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 03:10:50 -0400, Luke Campagnola
lcamp...@email.unc.edu
wrote:
I believe I have run into a class of bugs in PyQt4. I originally found
that
QSpinBox.lineEdit() returns a QLineEdit instance which
14 matches
Mail list logo
