Re: [pytest-dev] Feedback requested on new plugin

2019-07-10 Thread Arseniy Antonov
I got your point, Reece, but maybe it would be better to extend the pytest default config instead of making the plugin. Anyway, it's a good feature. 👍 чт, 11 июл. 2019 г. в 01:14, Reece Hart : > Jim- Interesting. Definitely related. Thanks for sharing that. > > Arseniy- The major motivation is to

Re: [pytest-dev] Feedback requested on new plugin

2019-07-10 Thread Reece Hart
Jim- Interesting. Definitely related. Thanks for sharing that. Arseniy- The major motivation is to disable certain tests by default. I tried to outline the shortcomings of current mechanisms in the README, but probably need a bit more. In any case, using -m expressions in the cfg file conflicts wi

Re: [pytest-dev] Feedback requested on new plugin

2019-07-10 Thread Arseniy Antonov
Hello, Why don't you want to add markers to pytest.ini config? For now, you can add custom run options to the pytest.ini file. [pytest]addopts = -m my_marker But I agree that separate option for run marked tests would be better. [pytest]addopts = -s -v markers_to_run = my_marker1, my_marker2

Re: [pytest-dev] Feedback requested on new plugin

2019-07-09 Thread Jim Brännlund
Nice! It looks similar to something that I did a while back: https://github.com/Projectplace/pytest-tags -- Jim Brännlund jimbrannl...@fastmail.com On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, at 3:35 AM, Reece Hart wrote: > I would appreciate feedback/code review on a pytest plugin (my first!) that I > wrote to

[pytest-dev] Feedback requested on new plugin

2019-07-08 Thread Reece Hart
I would appreciate feedback/code review on a pytest plugin (my first!) that I wrote today to simplify the use of pytest markers for optional tests. Code is at https://github.com/reece/pytest-optional-tests. tests and pypi deployments (via travis) are already available. I'm open to all comments: ut