Re: [pytest-dev] py._code

2016-08-08 Thread Ronny Pfannschmidt
On 08.08.2016 16:08, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: On 8 August 2016 at 06:48, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: That would break external code Uhm, so we've committed to mainting py._code in two places? Makes me wonder what the motivation to merge into pytest was. no, pylib will no longer evolve, its a

Re: [pytest-dev] py._code

2016-08-08 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On 8 August 2016 at 06:48, Ronny Pfannschmidt wrote: > That would break external code Uhm, so we've committed to mainting py._code in two places? Makes me wonder what the motivation to merge into pytest was. > Pylib is maintenance-only While it's not terribly actively developed there's still s

Re: [pytest-dev] py._code

2016-08-07 Thread Ronny Pfannschmidt
That would break external code Pylib is maintenance-only -- Ronny Am 8. August 2016 00:43:50 MESZ, schrieb Floris Bruynooghe : >Hi, > >We did move the py._code library over to pytest._code a little while >ago, I wasn't really involved so don't remember the details. But >seems it was never remov

[pytest-dev] py._code

2016-08-07 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
Hi, We did move the py._code library over to pytest._code a little while ago, I wasn't really involved so don't remember the details. But seems it was never removed from the py library itself. Was this on purpose? Do we want to maintain two versions of this code? Reason I'm asking is because t