Can we also change a bit the changelog to have actual links to issues/prs?
I often go through the changelog and what to see what the changes actually
were.
Thanks,
-- Ionel Cristian Mărieș, http://blog.ionelmc.ro
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, holger krekel wrote:
>
> I
I just list the usernames after the change and if the user contributed
for the first time, the fullname as well. See this for example:
https://github.com/fschulze/mr.developer/blob/master/CHANGES.rst
Regards,
Florian Schulze
On 11 Dec 2015, at 16:14, holger krekel wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11,
* holger krekel [2015-12-11 14:29:35 +]:
> I was wondering about the practise to have PR authors add themselves
> to AUTHORS and CHANGELOG. The latter particularly is a bit odd, i.e.
> to thank yourself for submitting a PR.
I agree - I've even been asked on Twitter
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM holger krekel wrote:
>
> I was wondering about the practise to have PR authors add themselves
> to AUTHORS and CHANGELOG. The latter particularly is a bit odd, i.e.
> to thank yourself for submitting a PR. What do you all think about
>
I was wondering about the practise to have PR authors add themselves
to AUTHORS and CHANGELOG. The latter particularly is a bit odd, i.e.
to thank yourself for submitting a PR. What do you all think about
having the merger do this last bit (changelog entry)? AUTHORS
can also be usually
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 14:48 +, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM holger krekel wrote:
>
> >
> > I was wondering about the practise to have PR authors add themselves
> > to AUTHORS and CHANGELOG. The latter particularly is a bit odd, i.e.
> > to