Why not reusing existing
https://github.com/PyCQA for that? I am personally concerned about having
too many orgs. One or two years ago we moved the doc8 tool from under
opendev/openstack in order to make it easier to maintain.
Its main goal seems to fit the repo quite well.
On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at
I don't think that pyfakefs will fit that - PyCQA is about formatting /
quality tools, while pyfakefs is a testing tool (both for pytest and
unittest).
And I agree about having too many orgs - as far as I can see, pytest-dev
is currently the only organization concerned with Python testing (the
While most repos inside pcqa are quality-assurance tools instead of just
libraries, my personal view is that there is no reason to distinguish
between a library that you use to improve testing ("quality assurance") and
a tool that helps you achieve the same.
As noted, pytest-dev is not ideal becau
I agree that QA is also about testing, but PyCQAÂ seems to be more specific:
> The PyCQA is a loose organization of people who maintain projects in
roughly the same domain: automatic style and quality reporting. Almost
all of these projects are widely used by the larger Python community
(and b
