Why not add the literal to 2.6 too?
If that's deemed undesirable, make it bytes(), as long
as that actually works when read back.
--Guido
On 2/24/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > Georg is channeling me well. Also, my thinking has evolved some after
> >
Yup, that was a typo. Someone else noticed it too. It's fixed in the
version of the slides I'll post to python.org.
--Guido
On 2/24/07, Ka-Ping Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> I'm in your keynote and looking at a slide right now that says
>
> * bytes has .encode() method return
Hi everybody,
It was great to see so many of you at PyCon --- even if we saw each
other for too long during the PSF meeting.
After hearing Guido's keynote talk today and realizing that the alpha
release of Python 3.0 is so soon, I decided that the right approach I
should take in pushing the
At 03:27 PM 2/24/2007 -0600, Collin Winter wrote:
>Are "new-style" except clauses the ones spelled "except E as NAME" while
>"old-style" ones are spelled "except E, NAME"?
Yes.
>What happens in this case:
>
>e = Exception()
>e.__traceback__ = T1
>raise Exception, e, T2
>
>Which traceback takes p
(Finally getting back around to this)
On 2/9/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Hm. Actually, that's not necessary. We could include .with_traceback(T)
> in 2.6, and just have old-style except: clauses delete the traceback from
> the returned objects. New-style except: claus
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> Georg is channeling me well. Also, my thinking has evolved some after
> talking to various folks here at PyCon.
>
> Georg, please check it in! Feel free to update the PEP if you will.
I will, if you answer me one question: in Python 2.6, should the repr()
return "bytes
Hi Guido,
I'm in your keynote and looking at a slide right now that says
* bytes has .encode() method returning a string
* str has a .decode() method returning bytes
Should the names of those two methods be swapped? I think it
makes more sense to say that an encoding is something that
t
Georg is channeling me well. Also, my thinking has evolved some after
talking to various folks here at PyCon.
Georg, please check it in! Feel free to update the PEP if you will.
--Guido
On 2/24/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giovanni Bajo schrieb:
> > On 24/02/2007 11.20, Georg Br
Giovanni Bajo schrieb:
> On 24/02/2007 11.20, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>> Thomas Wouters schrieb:
>>>
>>> That's exactly what it does in current p3yk:
>>>
>>> Python 3.0x (p3yk:53867M, Feb 23 2007, 20:06:03)
>>> [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>>> Type "help", "copyright
On 24/02/2007 11.20, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Thomas Wouters schrieb:
>>
>> That's exactly what it does in current p3yk:
>>
>> Python 3.0x (p3yk:53867M, Feb 23 2007, 20:06:03)
>> [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more
Thomas Wouters schrieb:
That's exactly what it does in current p3yk:
Python 3.0x (p3yk:53867M, Feb 23 2007, 20:06:03)
[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> b"""abc
... def"""
bytes([0x61, 0x62, 0
11 matches
Mail list logo
