"M.-A. Lemburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On 2008-05-08 22:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
| > Functions that map unicode->unicode or bytes->bytes could be called
| > transcoders. Each type could be given a .transcode method to go along
with
| > but contrast with .enc
Yesterday I was working on a patch for Cython to make the generated C
code works from Python 2.3 to 2.6 and also 3.0.
After four hours of carefully diving in Python sources from 2.3 to 3.0
and finishing the patch, the only stuff I would object from the
current codebase of Py3K is the status of PyN
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For sys.stdout this doesn't make sense at all, since it hides encoding
>>> errors for all applications using sys.stdout as piping mechanism.
>>> -1 on that.
>>
>> You can raise UnicodeEncodigError for encoding errors if
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 3:54 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-05-08 22:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> Functions that map unicode->unicode or bytes->bytes could be called
>> transcoders. Each type could be given a .transcode method to go along with
>> but contrast with .encode or
'n' is like 'g', but adds locale-specific thousands separators.
Issue 2802 (http://bugs.python.org/issue2802) points out that 'n'
formatting isn't useful for integers, because it first converts to
float. There's no way to get 1,000,000 as a result, since 'g' converts
to '1e+06'.
I propose a
Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
While I'm +0 on the commit hook, it would help if a mail that announces
a freeze would
- not be hidden in a thread on python-dev and
- have a easily recognizable title, like "[TRUNK FREEZE] ".
I will make the freeze annou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 9, 2008, at 8:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the past I seem to recall that the Python code proper might be
frozen
(for a day or two) before a release, but that it was okay to still
commit
changes to non-code files such as documentatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 9, 2008, at 6:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-05-08 13:59, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Since the trunk buildbots appea
In the past I seem to recall that the Python code proper might be frozen
(for a day or two) before a release, but that it was okay to still commit
changes to non-code files such as documentation or files in Misc. Is this
still the case in the new release-early-release-often regime? Is the
intent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 8, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
While I'm +0 on the commit hook, it would help if a mail that
announces
a freeze would
- not be hidden in a thread on python-dev and
- have a easily recognizable title, like "[TRUNK FREEZE] ".
On 2008-05-08 22:55, Terry Reedy wrote:
Functions that map unicode->unicode or bytes->bytes could be called
transcoders. Each type could be given a .transcode method to go along with
but contrast with .encode or .decode.
Are you suggesting to have two separate methods which then
allow same-ty
On 2008-05-08 13:59, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 8, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since the trunk buildbots appear to be mostly happy (well those that are
connected anyway), and because I couldn't get the relea
On 09/05/2008, at 04:45, Humberto Diogenes wrote:
I noticed you've already removed os.path.walk in r62909, but there
are still some references to it in the code, as I noticed issuing a
`make altinstall` on a Mac:
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'walk'
Here's the fix fo
Michael Urman writes:
> I know this way is fairly entrenched in the python release process,
> but it sounds like it's using the tools incorrectly. In particular
> with subversion is very easy (compared to cvs) to branch and to switch
> branches locally. Why not create a new prerelease branch a
On 08/05/2008, at 00:12, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I go ahead and remove this then?
Yes, but let's do it after Barry has released the alphas.
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
15 matches
Mail list logo
