On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:24 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm -1 on taking this approach this late in the release process.
>
> You are adding a completely new codec, which hasn't received enough
> testing. Furthermore, the concept of relying on OS defined codecs is
> not in line
There's a function in the cgi module called "parse_header", which
takes a MIME-style email header and returns the "main" value along
with a dictionary of the parameters in the header. I had to look for
a while before I found it; first I thought it should be in httplib,
then when it wasn't there I
Hi,
Guido van Rossum python.org> writes:
> > 2394[Py3k] Finish the memoryview object implementation
> > - - High priority
> > - - This one is serious enough to hold up the release. I really do not
think we
> > should be finishing this implementation in the rc phase.
>
> Can someone review
> 3352Deficiencies in multiprocessing/threading API
> - - Medium priority
> - - This one is getting some love, so I'm confident this will get fixed before
> beta 3.
>
This is complete on 2.6 as of r65864
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@pyth
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1179[CVE-2007-4965] Integer overflow in imageop module
>> - - High priority
>> - - This will block final release and I think it needs to be fixed for this
>> beta.
Submitted the patch to 2.5 and 2.6.
--
--Guido
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1878class attribute cache failure (regression)
> - - Medium priority
> - - Guido, there are some design choices that need your decision. I'd like to
> fix this for beta 3 if it's going to be fixed at all, because I sus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 19, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
1878class attribute cache failure (regression)
- - Medium priority
- - Guido, there are some design choices that n
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am going to try to release the last planned beta of 2.6 and 3.0 this
> Wednesday. Looking at the stable buildbots and showstopper bugs indicates
> s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I will be hanging out as much as possible over the next two days on
the #python-dev channel on freenode IRC. If you have any last minute
decisions you need, that will be the most immediate way to get in
touch with me.
Modulo work commitments,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:45 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Barry, could you please take a look at http://bugs.python.org/issue2834
?
It's not marked as release blocker but if it doesn't integrate beta3
it will
probably not make it at all into 3.0 (unless
Hi,
Would anybody object to the slight cleanup of the C PyMemoryView API that I
proposed in http://bugs.python.org/issue3560 ?
It's better to do this now before any third party extension starts relying on
it.
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-3000 maili
Barry, could you please take a look at http://bugs.python.org/issue2834 ?
It's not marked as release blocker but if it doesn't integrate beta3 it will
probably not make it at all into 3.0 (unless you are fine with such a change
before an rc).
Thanks
Antoine.
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
