> | @validate_proxy
> | proxy = "http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/"
> |
> | be a syntactical sugar for:
> | proxy = validate_proxy("http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/")
>
> Sorry, to me, this is syntactical pepper -- or worse ;-)
"Poison" perhaps? Then, maybe we can have Poisonous Python! :-
Hi,
We have function and class decorators. Can we also have decorators for
variable assignments?
For example:
@validate_proxy
proxy = "http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/"
be a syntactical sugar for:
proxy = validate_proxy("http://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port/")
Python is often used as a
> How do you get from "some keys can't be ordered" to "it doesn't make
> sense for Python to have sorteddict or sortedset"? If you want to use
> keys that can't be ordered, then feel free to continue to use dict.
> For situations in which ordering is important, that language should
> support that.
>
> I hope that Python gets a sorteddict and a
> sortedset.
It doesn't make sense for Python to have sorteddict or sortedset. You see,
dict can have keys which cannot be ordered (keys can be heterogeneous, in
which case Py3K may raise TypeError; ordering doesn't make sense for the
objects used a
> Asking Questions About Roles
Shouldn't there be some way to ``revoke'' roles?
How can we get a list of all roles played by an object?
Should there be a way to check ``loosely'' whether an object can
potentially play a given role? (i.e., checking whether an object
provides a give interface, atl
On 5/14/07, Anders J. Munch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You haven't brought any hard evidence to the table yourself, so in
the absense of that, my anecdotal evidence trumps your pure
speculation ;-)
Fact: Younger brains learn new concepts (and languages) faster than older
ones.
Argument: To be
