"Brett Cannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * UserList/UserString [done: 3.0]
>
Note that these were updated and moved to the collections module in
Py3.0.
Noted.
> anydbm
"Christian Heimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe Smith wrote:
>> While ml.exe is intentionally omitted for the express version of Visual
>> C++,
>> the standard versions of Visual Studio are supposed to include ml.exe.
>
"Christian Heimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Today an user named weck has submitted three patches for VS 2005 support
> [0]. In one of the replies Martin said that he likes to use the upcoming
> VS2008 as new default compiler.
>
> I've downloaded the Beta 2 of
"Paul Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 05/09/07, Gregory P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rather than resurrecting the old RSA-copyright md5.c I can easily make
>> new
>> ones out of the libtomcrypt md5 and sha1 sources the same way i created
>> the
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Someone added this comment to my blog
> (http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=106&thread=213583&start=0#278818):
>
> "Only a question please, I have Python 2.5 installed in my windows XP
> machine and I would
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Exactly the issue.
>> I see the problem here is cygwin's partial POSIX co
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Is this also a restriction on CYGWIN? I don't know
>>> anything about CYGWIN but I could imagine that they allow unlink() to
>>> succeed when there's still a file descriptor referencing it, and that
>>> they will
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Exactly the issue.
> I see the problem here is cygwin's partial POSIX complience. However,
> Windows NT had a design goal of allowing a complient implementation
> of POSIX to be i
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/31/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm... The documentation for Cygwin's unlink() implies that it should
>> function the same as a POSIX unlink() except per
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>>> I found that in many cases, this is a virus scanner or the indexing
>>> service interfering. They open the file, and then the test suite cannot
>>> delete it.
>>
>> Oh darn. I remember
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> If I patch io.py to default to "utf-8" rather than using the filesystem
>>> encoding (ascii), that fixes a few more things. (test_coding.py and
>>> test_minidom.py)
>>
>> How come the filesystem decoding is set to
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 7/18/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> I'm w
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/18/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'm wondering if the recusion limit on my build is getting set too low
>> >> somehow.
>> >
>&
"Greg Ewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe Smith wrote:
>> If the maintainers of most of the large packages that do imaging are
>> willing
>> to support this,
>> and your code is good, I see absolutely no reaso
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/21/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> One of the nice features of Eby's proposal is that more complicated
>> dispatching systems can be added. Perhaps some
"Talin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> At 07:49 AM 7/20/2007 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> On 7/19/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> So the state of the PEP? From the rest
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/19/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So the state of the PEP? From the rest of the posts so far,
>> it sounds like there is no real objection to the basic en
"Lino Mastrodomenico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>2007/7/1, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> But I cannot see how it would solve the problem with to many image
>> classes. The reason why PIL, PyGame and wxPython has different image
>> classes is because eac
So the state of the PEP? From the rest of the posts so far,
it sounds like there is no real objection to the basic end user API as
described in the PEP,
except for the case of retroactive generification, which GvR wants made
explict in the user's code, AIUI.
But there are concerns about the imp
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/18/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7/17/07, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Building Py3k_struni under Cygwin I've noticed a few more tests failing
>> than
>> the wiki shows.
>> T
Building Py3k_struni under Cygwin I've noticed a few more tests failing than
the wiki shows.
These are using SVN revision 56413.
Some spurious errors seem to occur if Python/ is not remaned temporally. I
have not included those. (This is an oddity of the cygwin '.exe'
autohandling combined with
22 matches
Mail list logo
