Re: [Python-3000] the future of the GIL

2007-05-08 Thread Luis P Caamano
tly on multiple CPUs. It takes a bit of researching through old emails in the python list and a bit of time to really understand that. Nevertheless, when the itch is bad enough, it'll get scratched. -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA ___ Python-3000 m

Re: [Python-3000] Generic function PEP won't make it in time

2007-04-24 Thread Luis P Caamano
class Eggs: def thePublicMethod(self): things = self._myProtected() return [ "thing_%s" % str(thing) for thing in things] def _myProtected(self): raise RuntimeError("missing base method") class RealEggs(AbstractEggs): def _myProtected(self):

Re: [Python-3000] threading, part 2

2006-08-11 Thread Luis P Caamano
believe that if a user cannot design and implement their own system to > handle when a thread can be killed or not to their own satisfaction, > then they have no business killing threads. > > > - Josiah > -- Luis P Caamano Atlanta, GA USA _

Re: [Python-3000] threading, part 2

2006-08-10 Thread Luis P Caamano
y quickly > > >> > > >> Proper resource cleanup would be reliant on correct use of try/finally > > >> or with > > >> statements, but that's the case regardless of whether or not asynchronous > > >&g

[Python-3000] GIL

2006-04-19 Thread Luis P Caamano
ities with C extensions that rely on the GIL and since python 3000 is not promising any backward compatibility, then it seems this might be a good opportunity to tackle that issue too. I'm not proposing any solution, just trying to figure out whether it's a valid issue or not. -- Luis P Caam