Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Seriously, nobody, even coming from another language, will be able to look at
>it
>and say, "yes, that's an octal literal."
Scientific googling reveals that most other languages that use 0x for hex use
0b for binary and either 0o or 0 for octal, so if "c
"Patrick Maupin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>That's a great idea all the way around. Another possible syntax would
>be [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc. I don't think that could mean
>anything
>currently.
It's a terrible idea all the way around. Be reasonable: in modern
code, only de
