Steven Bethard wrote:
> Just like everywhere else, you can use parentheses:
>
assert True, (
> ... 'ASDF')
Yes, but you have to put the opening paren in
a somewhat awkward place to get it to work.
Seems to me it would be much more intuitive to
use what Haskell calls the "offside rule",
Andrew Koenig wrote:
>> I'm not proposing to remove the feature, however I'd like to see an
>> alternative method for declaring statements that cross a line boundary.
>> I seem to recall at one point someone suggesting the use of ellipsis,
>> which makes a lot of sense to me:
>>
>> sorted_resul
> I'm not proposing to remove the feature, however I'd like to see an
> alternative method for declaring statements that cross a line boundary.
> I seem to recall at one point someone suggesting the use of ellipsis,
> which makes a lot of sense to me:
>
> sorted_result = partition_lower( input
On 4/13/07, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/13/07, Paul Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Talin wrote:
> > > I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation
>
> > Me neither, but the suggested replacements don't appeal to me either.
> > Is there any reason we
On 4/13/07, Paul Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talin wrote:
> > I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation
> Me neither, but the suggested replacements don't appeal to me either.
> Is there any reason we can't just remove them ?
> Is backslash continuation still ne
Talin wrote:
> I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation
Me neither, but the suggested replacements don't appeal to me either.
Is there any reason we can't just remove them ?
Is backslash continuation still needed anywhere,
or does the grammar now allow for sufficient pa
Talin wrote:
> I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation
How about regarding a line as a continuation if it's
indented more than the one which started the statement?
> 1) It requires that it be the last character of a line,
That requirement could be removed, couldn't i
On 4/11/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talin schrieb:
> > I'm not sure that I am the first to bring this up, but I might as well
> > get it written down.
> >
> > I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation, for
> > two reasons:
> >
> > 1) It requires that it b
Talin schrieb:
> I'm not sure that I am the first to bring this up, but I might as well
> get it written down.
>
> I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation, for
> two reasons:
>
> 1) It requires that it be the last character of a line, meaning that you
> have to insu
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 11:01, Talin wrote:
> Parsing-wise, an ellipsis operator would have the following meaning:
> Inside a parenthesized or bracketed expression, it would have the same
> meaning it does now. Otherwise, it has the meaning "consume all
> whitespace, including newlines".
Re
I'm not sure that I am the first to bring this up, but I might as well
get it written down.
I've never liked using the backslash operator for line continuation, for
two reasons:
1) It requires that it be the last character of a line, meaning that you
have to insure that there's no trailing whi
11 matches
Mail list logo
