On 5/8/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the lack of discussion following the posting of the PEP, let's accept
> it.
Marked as accepted in r55190.
Collin Winter
> On 5/8/07, Jack Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:12:40AM -0700, Guido van R
Cool! Looking forward to it. Collin or someone else can help you get
it checked in if you don't have dev privs yet.
Given the lack of discussion following the posting of the PEP, let's accept it.
On 5/8/07, Jack Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:12:40AM -0700, Guid
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:12:40AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can I go ahead and mark PEP 3129 as "accepted"?
>
> Almost. I'm ok with it, but I think that to follow the procedure you
> ought to post the full text at least once on python
On 5/7/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This PEP proposes class decorators, an extension to the function
> and method decorators introduced in PEP 318.
[...]
> The semantics and design goals of class decorators are the same as
> for function decorators ([#semantics]_, [#goals]_)
Guido pointed out that this PEP hadn't been sent to the list yet.
Abstract
This PEP proposes class decorators, an extension to the function
and method decorators introduced in PEP 318.
Rationale
=
When function decorators were originally debated for inclusion in
Python 2.4, c
On 5/7/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I go ahead and mark PEP 3129 as "accepted"?
Almost. I'm ok with it, but I think that to follow the procedure you
ought to post the full text at least once on python-3000, so you can
add the date to the "Post-History" header. In the mean tim
Can I go ahead and mark PEP 3129 as "accepted"?
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
