Re: [Python-3000] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule (bytes/unicde again)

2008-10-07 Thread Bill Janssen
Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - And then, getopt and optparse modules should work on bytestring > > vectors, so that you can use sys.argvb without writing your own > > argument parser. They don't currently. > > Then we will gradually start moving all modules even remotely re

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule (bytes/unicde again)

2008-10-07 Thread Eric Smith
Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hi, James Y Knight fuhm.net> writes: - Having os.getcwdb isn't much use when you can't even run python in the first place when the current directory has "bad" bytes in it. I don't agree it's a similar problem. Python should be installed in a well-known place with a s

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed Python 3.0 schedule (bytes/unicde again)

2008-10-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hi, James Y Knight fuhm.net> writes: > > - Having os.getcwdb isn't much use when you can't even run python in > the first place when the current directory has "bad" bytes in it. I don't agree it's a similar problem. Python should be installed in a well-known place with a sensible path. Of