Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 8, 2008, at 7:25 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Well, from the number of release blockers it sounds like another 3.0 beta is the right thing. For 2.6 however I believe we're much closer to the finish line -- there aren't all those bytes/str issu

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-09 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 8, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: Perhaps it's time to separate the 2.6 and 3.0 release schedules? I don't care if the next version of OSX contains 3.0 or not -- but I do care about it having 2.6. I've talked with my contact at M

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-09 Thread Jesse Noller
On Sep 8, 2008, at 1:13 PM, "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think there's any way we're going to make our October 1st goal. We have 8 open release critical bugs, and 18 deferred blockers. We do

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-08 Thread Christian Heimes
Guido van Rossum wrote: Well, from the number of release blockers it sounds like another 3.0 beta is the right thing. For 2.6 however I believe we're much closer to the finish line -- there aren't all those bytes/str issues to clean up, for example! And apparently the benefit of releasing on sche

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I don't think there's any way we're going to make our October 1s

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-08 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think there's any way we're going to make our October 1st goal. We >> have 8 open release critical bugs, and 18 deferred blockers. We d

Re: [Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-08 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think there's any way we're going to make our October 1st goal. We > have 8 open release critical bugs, and 18 deferred blockers. We do not have > a beta3 Windows installer and I don't have high hopes for rectifying

[Python-3000] Proposed revised schedule

2008-09-08 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't think there's any way we're going to make our October 1st goal. We have 8 open release critical bugs, and 18 deferred blockers. We do not have a beta3 Windows installer and I don't have high hopes for rectifying all of these problems i