On 3/10/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/9/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> > Okay, I looked into it.
> > The old attribute semantics of offering a custom tp_getattr
> > which dispatches to methods and members is mainly used in very old
> > and platform-spe
On 3/9/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > I don't recall ripping them out, but it's worth trying to do that --
> > they really shouldn't be needed for modern extensionmodules (2.2+).
> >
> > On 3/7/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> While revie
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I don't recall ripping them out, but it's worth trying to do that --
> they really shouldn't be needed for modern extensionmodules (2.2+).
>
> On 3/7/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> While reviewing the patch for __dir__() (which I'll apply then, since it
I don't recall ripping them out, but it's worth trying to do that --
they really shouldn't be needed for modern extensionmodules (2.2+).
On 3/7/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While reviewing the patch for __dir__() (which I'll apply then, since it was
> generally agreed upon at leas
While reviewing the patch for __dir__() (which I'll apply then, since it was
generally agreed upon at least for Py3k), I came about this:
/* Merge in __members__ and __methods__ (if any).
XXX Would like this to go away someday; for now, it's
XXX needed to get at im_self etc of method objec
