Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> > I was going to comment about this one "check it in, we'll add to it
>> > later", but then I realized it's not 100% clear whether this is a
>> > feature PEP or a meta-PEP? It focuses on featu
Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Subject: Re: [Python-3000] pre-PEP: Things that Will Not Change in
> Python 3.0
> To: python-3000@python.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Guido
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Good idea. Maybe 3000 should then be the meta-meta PEP with the
> Process for deciding Python 3000 Processes.
And if we get too many more meta-meta-PEPs we'll need
a meta-meta-meta-PEP on Procedure for Numbering
Meta-Meta-PEPs. Not sure what number it should have,
though
On 4/4/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I was going to comment about this one "check it in, we'll add to it
> > later", but then I realized it's not 100% clear whether this is a
> > feature PEP or a meta-PEP? It focuses on features so by that yardstick
> > i
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I was going to comment about this one "check it in, we'll add to it
> later", but then I realized it's not 100% clear whether this is a
> feature PEP or a meta-PEP? It focuses on features so by that yardstick
> it's a feature PEP. But in its list-of-miscellany nature it
>
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I was going to comment about this one "check it in, we'll add to it
> later", but then I realized it's not 100% clear whether this is a
> feature PEP or a meta-PEP?
> In any case let's not let it longer for long. Real
I was going to comment about this one "check it in, we'll add to it
later", but then I realized it's not 100% clear whether this is a
feature PEP or a meta-PEP? It focuses on features so by that yardstick
it's a feature PEP. But in its list-of-miscellany nature it
approximates a meta-PEP. Hmm, perh
Georg Brandl wrote:
> PEP: XXX
> Title: Things that will Not Change in Python 3000
>
> ...
>
> Copyright
> =
I was expecting to see something like "The Python licence
will not change" under this heading. :-)
--
Greg
___
Python-3000 mailing li
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 4/2/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A quick idea of mine: Wouldn't it be useful to maintain a list of what will
>> not change, collected in the discussions here? That way, people eager to
>> suggest
>> braces and whatnot can be referred to it.
>>
>> (I'd
