Steven Bethard wrote:
> Of course, this is almost exactly what the class statement does under
> the covers.
That 'almost' you have there covers some pretty significant differences though.
> The important points in the code above are the ``MAKE_FUNCTION`` and
> ``CALL_FUNCTION`` from the class sta
On 11/16/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but here's some abuse that I couldn't help chuckling
> over. No need to even bother constructing a class, but don't forget that
> 'return locals()' at the end! (not that I'm advocating its [ab]use,
> just something that made me smile)
>
> -
Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tomer filiba wrote:
>
> > we should also note that it's possible to replace "__metaclass__"
> > by a @metaclass decorator.
>
> I don't think so. Your proposed technique for that seems to
> involve creating an ordinary class first, then taking it
> apart
tomer filiba wrote:
> we should also note that it's possible to replace "__metaclass__"
> by a @metaclass decorator.
I don't think so. Your proposed technique for that seems to
involve creating an ordinary class first, then taking it
apart and recreating it using the specified metaclass.
That sme
On 11/16/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we should find some more/better use-cases than what i came
up with, and show why class decorators are the right solution,
and compare with function decorators.
A while ago I was trying to implement the Singleton or Borg design pattern
and
tomer filiba wrote:
>> Did I mention I care about this feature and don't want
>> a raft of crazies screwing it up with their own vices?
>
> i don't get your point.
maybe your news server is dropping posts ?
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@p
several things:
[Josiah]
> I believe that Tomer just wanted to remind people that class decorators
> are slated for 2.6 and 3.0 if there was a PEP, and perhaps that he is
> encouraging someone to write one.
yeah, i just wanted to bring it up again. however, i do have some
spare time at the moment
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:06:04AM +0200, tomer filiba wrote:
[tomer filiba wrote stuff]
I was hoping this thread would go unremarked but it looks like
it is picking up some steam. So I'll throw in my two bits:
Please for the love of god abandon this thread. It has been done.
You weren't there
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/15/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i understand there's a green light for class decorators in py3k,
> > so i wanted to give the issue a slight push.
>
> "Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW, most of the arguments
On 11/15/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i understand there's a green light for class decorators in py3k,
> so i wanted to give the issue a slight push.
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, most of the arguments against PEP 359 were along the lines of,
> "well you can
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/15/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i understand there's a green light for class decorators in py3k,
> > so i wanted to give the issue a slight push.
> FWIW, most of the arguments against PEP 359 were along the lines of,
> "well yo
tomer filiba wrote:
> i'm not saying this particular example is useful, but i have
> had many times when i thought "argh, i wish i had class
> decorators for that".
Same here, but like Steve, I'm not very optimistic this will be
greeted with open arms.
> sadly though, i don't remember many of t
On 11/15/06, tomer filiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i understand there's a green light for class decorators in py3k,
> so i wanted to give the issue a slight push.
If you haven't already, you should look at PEP 359, which tried to
address many of the same use-cases and was withdrawn after feedb
i understand there's a green light for class decorators in py3k,
so i wanted to give the issue a slight push.
one problem with metaclasses is they are non-nestable, i.e., a
function can be wrapped by a number of decorators, while
classes can have only one metaclass.
not only that, but metaclasses
14 matches
Mail list logo
