> I think it can actually be simplified. I think maintaining binary
> compatibility between 2.6 and earlier versions is hopeless anyway
ABI-wise or API-wise?
I would surely hope that the 2.6 API is "mostly" compatible with the
2.5 API.
Regards,
Martin
On 3/16/08, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Moving this to a new subject to keep the discussion of tasks and the
> > discussion of task tracking tools separate.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collin Winter wrote:
> > The biggest win in terms of performance would be to reimplement the
> > pattern matching engine used by the fixers.: it by far dominates the
> > running time, taking 99+% of the runtime when
> > * Replace Windows API calls with wide versions to support unicode
> >for file names, environment etc.
>
> +1. This should be broken into separate tasks for each API.
What are we referring to here? Calling the W versions explicitly and using
wchar_t for everything, or using the TCHAR/TEX
Collin Winter wrote:
> The biggest win in terms of performance would be to reimplement the
> pattern matching engine used by the fixers.: it by far dominates the
> running time, taking 99+% of the runtime when I ran 2to3 over Twisted,
> for example. The current design is a heavily-recursive system,
>>> * Replace Windows API calls with wide versions to support unicode
>>> for file names, environment etc.
>> +1. This should be broken into separate tasks for each API.
>
> What are we referring to here? Calling the W versions explicitly and
> using wchar_t for everything, or using the TCHAR/TE
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Benjamin Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > PyString -> PyBytes ...
> > >
> > > -1. This
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
> > and add the fixers to 2to3
>
> +1. I think quite a few changes have not had a fixer added. Again, I
> think we should maintain a
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > PyString -> PyBytes ...
> >
> > -1. This will make merging code from 2.6 harder, and causes more work
> > for porting C extensions.
>
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving this to a new subject to keep the discussion of tasks and the
> discussion of task tracking tools separate.
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I did a quick b
10 matches
Mail list logo
