et for python-2.* as versions get
bumped there.
That's more the issue I guess.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Guido van Rossum
Sent: Fri 11/14/2008 10:24 AM
To: Smith-Rowland, Edward M
Cc: python-3000@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-3000] Install python-3000
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Currently on Windows, python3.0 is installed as just plain 'python'.
This already causes problems when I want to choose 2.5 or 3.0. In my
quick start list, I have two entries which both say "Python (command
line)" with the *same* icon.
What is a quick start list, and ho
>I think it's Windows Quick Launch bar:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=windows+quick+launch
> http://images.google.com/images?q=windows+quick+launch
I see. Then I still don't fully understand the problem.
Terry apparently had to add the Python command line to the
quick launch bar himself
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:27:24PM +0100, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> > Currently on Windows, python3.0 is installed as just plain 'python'.
> > This already causes problems when I want to choose 2.5 or 3.0. In my
> > quick start list, I have two entries which both say "Python (command
> > line)" w
> Ah, Windows. Can you file a bug about this? I think only MvL can do
> something about this.
Not really. We don't install anything into a quick start list (see my
other message - I don't even know what that is). For other icons, I
can't do anything, either; my artistic abilities are zero.
Regard
> Currently on Windows, python3.0 is installed as just plain 'python'.
> This already causes problems when I want to choose 2.5 or 3.0. In my
> quick start list, I have two entries which both say "Python (command
> line)" with the *same* icon.
What is a quick start list, and how did you get Pyth
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> No, no, no! *Eventually* Python 3.0 will just be "python". Until
>> then, it needs to be "python3.0".
>
> I think you should consider changing the installation policy to installing
> each file w
Guido van Rossum wrote:
No, no, no! *Eventually* Python 3.0 will just be "python". Until
then, it needs to be "python3.0".
I think you should consider changing the installation policy to
installing each file with its own pythonx.y name and alias exactly one,
the system default, as 'python'.
10:24 AM
> To: Smith-Rowland, Edward M
> Cc: python-3000@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-3000] Install python-3000 as python3
>
> No, no, no! *Eventually* Python 3.0 will just be "python". Until
> then, it needs to be "python3.0".
>
> Long agon, Red Ha
No, no, no! *Eventually* Python 3.0 will just be "python". Until
then, it needs to be "python3.0".
Long agon, Red Hat installed Python 2 as "python2" instead of "python"
and it led to endless problems.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Smith-Rowland, Edward M
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When
10 matches
Mail list logo
