On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the olden days, 2to3 used to run on 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6, but at some
> point (PyCon 2008, I believe) the decision was taken to intentionally
> drop support for 2.4 and 2.5.
Does that mean I can go ahead and apply the pa
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Robert Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
>> If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
>> to go through a step with the -3 warnings
>> and optional text/bytes annotations.
>>
>> IMO, it would be
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
> If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
> to go through a step with the -3 warnings
> and optional text/bytes annotations.
>
> IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter.
>
> - Original Message -
>
The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
to go through a step with the -3 warnings
and optional text/bytes annotations.
IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PR
