>> Is there a way to make distutils do this for me with a simple command-
>> line switch?
>
> Yes - provide a patch :)
>
>> 2) Add the same compilation mode to Python itself, so that users can
>> easily compile a Python DLL which has debug symbols but with the release
>> ABI (since stepping int
Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 11:13 pm, "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've been exercising the new keyword-only arguments syntax. It is
>>> absolutely wonderful. I'm amazed at how many
On 18 Feb 2008, at 19:39, Talin wrote:
> Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
>>
[...]
>> Unconvincingly yours,
>
> Well, that is certainly a logical continuation of the train of
> thought behind the 'single *' syntax.
> I'd be curious to know which parts of 3102 people are finding most
> useful. You see
Hello.
In Python 3, when opening a file without declaring the encoding
keyword is Python going to guess the encoding of the file or just use
the default? That is, assume the file is UTF-8?
What led me to wonder this is that on Mac OS X 10.4.11, opening a file
containing UTF-8 encoded text create
On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A typical use of positional-only arguments is with a function
>
> def f(x, y=1, **kwargs):
> ...
>
> where keyword arguments are potentially anything at all, including x
> and y. For example: dict.update(). In fact it
