Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> Two options exist here: http://bugs.python.org/issue2477
> I have no plans to finish this patch off anytime soon. But this
> should be enough to make further progress.
Thank you very much, Neal!
I've merged your patch with mine. It works very well. The new patch is
avail
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> > Two options exist here: http://bugs.python.org/issue2477
> > I have no plans to finish this patch off anytime soon. But this
> > should be enough to make further progress.
>
> Thank you very
Ralf Schmitt schrieb:
> Is there a webinterface for viewing that patch?
I don't know but I've appended the patch to the feature request
http://bugs.python.org/issue2477
Christian
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Barry> All the gory details are documented here:
>
>Barry> http://www.python.org/dev/bazaar
>
> Thanks. I checked out, made a branch named test3, changed
> Makefile.pre.in
> to ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 25, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Ralf Schmitt wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Christian Heimes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> > Two options exist here: http://bugs.python.org/issue2477
> > I have no plans to finish
>> Did I misread the directions or do I really need the --create-prefix
>> arg?
Barry> You do, the first time you push a user branch because users/skip
Barry> doesn't exist yet. It's mentioned in the docs, but it's pretty
Barry> easy to overlook ;).
Well, I noticed the menti
Python 3.0 set and dict literals produce very different bytecode:
>>> dis(lambda:{1,2,3})
1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (1)
3 LOAD_CONST 1 (2)
6 LOAD_CONST 2 (3)
9 BUILD_SET3
12 RETURN_V
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Python 3.0 set and dict literals produce very different bytecode:
>
> >>> dis(lambda:{1,2,3})
> 1 0 LOAD_CONST 0 (1)
> 3 LOAD_CONST 1 (2)
> 6 LOAD
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
> I worry that there might be generated code using disgustingly large
> literals.
I don't see how this would presents a bigger problem to the stack
scheme compared to the current insert as you go scheme. Note that
for "d
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..
> > I worry that there might be generated code using disgustingly large
> > literals.
>
> I don't see how this would presents a bigger
If you ask a scientist, even a computer scientist, what "lambda" means he
will invariably answer that it is a letter in the Greek alphabet. Only a few
people working with lambda calculus will think of "lambda" as being related
to a function. Many beginners (included myself) were puzzled by "lambda"
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I meant that there may be disgustingly
> large globals that exceed some maximum size the stack allows.
I am to aware of any hard limit on the stack size other than whatever
the limit for a contiguous in-memory array may be
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Olivier Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you ask a scientist, even a computer scientist, what "lambda" means he
> will invariably answer that it is a letter in the Greek alphabet. Only a few
> people working with lambda calculus will think of "lambda" as bei
Benjamin Peterson schrieb:
> Guido once said that he hadn't found a better name. Well, I think
> that almost *any* name will do better! ;-) Especially a name that
> emphasizes the fact that lambda construction are in fact functions.
> This is what Guido repeats over and over again:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It does not even have to be a frozenset. A set works just as well,
> > never modified by the produced bytecode.
>
> With the current im
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:42:25PM +0100, Olivier Verdier wrote:
> Many beginners (included myself) were puzzled by "lambda" the
> first time they meet it. It doesn't look as clean as the rest of python
How many beginners know the meaning of "list comprehension"?
"generator"? "tuple"?
Oleg.
--
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Olivier Verdier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you ask a scientist, even a computer scientist, what "lambda" means he
> will invariably answer that it is a letter in the Greek alphabet. Only a few
> people working with lambda calculus will think of "lambda" as bein
Olivier Verdier wrote:
> Any thoughts about that? Any ideas of other better names than "lambda"?
A while back I created and proposed a patch that would change the syntax
of lambda to be more like a generator expression. So instead of writing:
lambda x: x * x
you would write:
(x * x giv
The next releases of 2.6/3.0 are planned for April 2, just over a week
from now. There is much work that needs to be done. The buildbots
are in a pretty sad state and the gods are seeing too much red.
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/stable/
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/
See my
We need to get the tests for Python to be more stable so we can push
out solid releases. In order to achieve this result, we need tests
that are *100% reliable* and fail _only when there is a problem with
Python_. While we aren't nearly as close to that goal as we need to
be, we have to work towa
20 matches
Mail list logo
