> I just checked in r62163 with this change:
> -rc = os.system(r"ml64 -c -Foms\uptable.obj ms\uptable.asm")
> +rc = os.system("ml64 -c -Foms\\uptable.obj ms\\uptable.asm")
>
> What should happen with raw unicode strings that contain a \u? The
> old code above was generatin
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > I just checked in r62163 with this change:
> > -rc = os.system(r"ml64 -c -Foms\uptable.obj ms\uptable.asm")
> > +rc = os.system("ml64 -c -Foms\\uptable.obj ms\\uptable.asm")
> >
> > What should happen with raw unicode strings that contain a \u?
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > > I just checked in r62163 with this change:
> > > -rc = os.system(r"ml64 -c -Foms\uptable.obj
> ms\uptable.asm")
> > > +rc = os.system("ml64 -c -Foms\\uptable.obj
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked in r62163 with this change:
> -rc = os.system(r"ml64 -c -Foms\uptable.obj ms\uptable.asm")
> +rc = os.system("ml64 -c -Foms\\uptable.obj ms\\uptable.asm")
>
> What should happen with
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just checked in r62163 with this change:
> > -rc = os.system(r"ml64 -c -Foms\uptable.obj
> ms\uptable.asm")
> > +rc
Thanks -- that was quick!
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just checked in r621
:-)
So did the broken version make it into the 3.0a4 release, or did you
break it after the release?
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks -- that was quick!
> Well,
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks -- that was quick!
Well, I was the guilty party...
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Benjamin Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAI
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :-)
>
> So did the broken version make it into the 3.0a4 release, or did you
> break it after the release?
>
Missed it by 7 revisions! I'm going to add a test for that, though, so it
doesn't happen again.
>
>
> On Sat,
If this is the case, could the regex library be modified to support \u and
\U escapes as suggested by Martin v. Löwis[1]? Otherwise, the only way to
use non-ASCII characters in a regex will be to avoid raw strings.
[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/073074.html
__
John Millikin wrote:
> If this is the case, could the regex library be modified to support \u
> and \U escapes
+1 (not surprisingly). Would you like to work on a patch?
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.pyt
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :-)
> >
> > So did the broken version make it into the 3.0a4 release, or did you
> > break it after the release?
> >
> Missed it by 7 revis
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Benjamin Peterson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > So did the broken version make it into
13 matches
Mail list logo