Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen a couple of objections to leaving unbound methods naked (as
> functions) when retrieved in 3.0. Here is a plus.
>
> A c.l.p poster reported that 2.6 broke his code because the addition of
> default rich comparisons to object turned tests like
Mark Seaborn wrote:
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have seen a couple of objections to leaving unbound methods naked (as
functions) when retrieved in 3.0. Here is a plus.
A c.l.p poster reported that 2.6 broke his code because the addition of
default rich comparisons to object tur
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Seaborn wrote:
> > Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have seen a couple of objections to leaving unbound methods naked (as
> >> functions) when retrieved in 3.0. Here is a plus.
> >>
> >> A c.l.p poster reported that 2.6 broke his co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My
suggestion:
15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4
05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2
19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3
03-Dec-2008 3.0 final
Given what still needs to be done, is this a reasonable schedule? Do
we n
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My
> suggestion:
>
> 15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4
> 05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2
> 19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3
> 03-Dec-2008 3
Mark Seaborn wrote:
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Seaborn wrote:
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have seen a couple of objections to leaving unbound methods naked (as
functions) when retrieved in 3.0. Here is a plus.
A c.l.p poster reported that 2.6 broke his code b
[Barry Warsaw]
So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0. My
suggestion:
15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4
05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2
19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3
03-Dec-2008 3.0 final
Given what still needs to be done, is this a reasonable schedule? Do
we need two more betas?
Yes to bot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 6, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Barry Warsaw]
So, we need to come up with a new release schedule for Python 3.0.
My suggestion:
15-Oct-2008 3.0 beta 4
05-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 2
19-Nov-2008 3.0 rc 3
03-Dec-2008 3.0 final
Given w
On Oct 6, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
I'm not sure we do. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "big ticket",
issue bytes/unicode filepaths, has been resolved. And looking at the
tracker, I only see 18 release blockers.
Well, if you mean that the resolution decided upon is to "simply
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On approximately 10/3/2008 11:57 PM, came the following characters from the
> keyboard of Adam Olsen:
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Alternative 3: Portable programs u
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On approximately 10/6/2008 10:18 PM, came the following characters from the
> keyboard of Adam Olsen:
>> But "Unicode" on windows is invalid. It shares all the same problems
>> UTF-8b does, but worse as a correct UTF-16
11 matches
Mail list logo
