Glenn Linderman wrote:
> BDFL has chosen scheme
> 2, it seems, unless he changes his mind. It has the advantages that few
> or no code changes are necessary to handle files that have Unicode
> names, and applications that want to handle files with non-Unicode names
> can, but have to work harder.
Glenn Linderman writes:
> OK, but file names are not (always) Unicode strings. So it is possible
> to have a conforming process that still manipulates non-Unicode
> filenames, as long as it doesn't emit them in places where Unicode
> strings are required.
Sure. My point is that "emission
2008/10/10 Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If FOOTR is using PUA chars, then I believe that users should not be
> providing such a stream as it would have no defined meaning coming from
> them.
PUA already has a UTF-8 representation, so this is the worst choice
among UTF-8b and U+ which do
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On approximately 10/9/2008 11:55 PM, came the following characters from the
> keyboard of Stephen J. Turnbull:
>> The problem that all the proposals face is that they assume that we
>> know where the cleaning up will be d
