I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My first
problem appears to be the reliance on a complete(?) rewrite of the buffer stuff.
Any clues about transforming this code would be much appreciated.
(Note: I'm backporting because the Python 2.6 version appears to be mu
Hi Skip,
I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
back port the trunk version (2.6) or py3000?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Skip Montanaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My
> first
> problem appe
> I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
> back port the trunk version (2.6) or py3000?
I'm trying to backport from 2.6. It appears that the buffer stuff is
completely
new though (backported from Python 3.0).
S
___
Python
Also note, for python 2.4/2.5 you are going to *need* the patch to bug
http://bugs.python.org/issue874900
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Skip,
>
> I had been approached to do the exact same thing, are you trying to
> back port the trunk version (2.6)
Skip Montanaro wrote:
I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My first
problem appears to be the reliance on a complete(?) rewrite of the buffer stuff.
Any clues about transforming this code would be much appreciated.
(Note: I'm backporting because the Python 2.6
Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
us are interested in this? :)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to try backporting the multiprocessing module to Python 2.4. My
>> first
>> probl
Jesse Noller wrote:
Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
us are interested in this? :)
Do we need (yet) another Google code project? Isn't svn.python.org
sufficient for our needs? I'm -0 on a Google code project but I'll give
you my gmail account if you insist
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesse Noller wrote:
>>
>> Do we want to start a google code project for this given all three of
>> us are interested in this? :)
>
> Do we need (yet) another Google code project? Isn't svn.python.org
> sufficient for our
Skip Montanaro wrote:
> (Note: I'm backporting because the Python 2.6 version appears to be much more
> robust than the 0.52 third-party release.)
As Jesse points out, some of that robustness comes from long-standing
bugs in the core getting fixed as a result of the addition of the
multiprocessing
Nick Coghlan wrote:
As Jesse points out, some of that robustness comes from long-standing
bugs in the core getting fixed as a result of the addition of the
multiprocessing unit tests to the standard library test suite.
Not trying to discourage the project, just pointing out that it may not
be as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was supposed to release 3.0rc2 last night, but events caught up with
me. In going through the release blockers tonight, I do not think we
are ready to release. Here are the issues that need addressing:
Showstoppers:
3775 Update RELNOTES fil
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I deferred these but I would really like to get them fixed before rc2.
>
> 3664 Pickler.dump from a badly initialized Pickler segfaults
> - This one needs a proper patch with a test
I posted the patch for that one. Please
12 matches
Mail list logo
