Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Walter Dörwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> An Interface is an abstract class that you subclass to make it a
>> concrete implementation.
>
> That's not the view of most people who use the word interface these
> days. Not in Zope (see Fred Drake's post), not in
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Okay, radical/insane/heretical question time: do we really need literal
> tuple syntax? IOW, what if (1, 2, 3) created a frozenset instead of a
> tuple?
>
> Or perhaps an even stupider idea: what if the compiler could recognize
> certain use cases and generate different type
