[issue1715] Make pydoc list submodules

Changes by Christian Heimes: -- assignee: - georg.brandl keywords: +patch nosy: +georg.brandl priority: - normal __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1715 __

[issue1694] floating point number round failures under Linux

Changes by Christian Heimes: __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1694 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1703] getpass broken in Py3k: must flush()

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Committed revision 59646. -- nosy: +gvanrossum resolution: - accepted status: open - closed type: - behavior __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1703 __

[issue1717] Get rid of more refercenes to __cmp__

New submission from Guido van Rossum: Should I apply this? There are more places that reference __cmp__ in the library. OTOH there are some folks who would like to see __cmp__ make a come-back as a shorthand for defining 6 comparison operators, for totally-ordered types. (I'm still waiting

[issue1713] posixpath.ismount() claims symlink to a mountpoint is a mountpoint.

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Go ahead then! -- assignee: - tiran nosy: +gvanrossum resolution: - accepted __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1713 __

[issue1711] socket functions that should return unsigned int return signed int

Guido van Rossum added the comment: This should be fixed. Maarten, can you create a patch that works for you? (Since few of us have access to the platform where it breaks.) -- nosy: +gvanrossum __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue1711] socket functions that should return unsigned int return signed int

Maarten Thibaut added the comment: Guido, the problem is that my python foo is severely lacking - but I'll have a stab at it. Python believes that the number coming back from the C library is negative. We can fool it by packing the signed short into a system-native format, and then unpacking it

[issue1711] socket functions that should return unsigned int return signed int

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Maarten, can you build Python 2.6 from svn? (See http://www.python.org/dev/faq/#subversion-svn for help.) It looks like this has been fixed there, per r53434. Perhaps the same changes can be backported. __ Tracker [EMAIL

[issue1718] Tarfile fails to fully extract tar.bz2/tar.gz package

New submission from Ismail Donmez: Running python 2.5 maintainance branch, Test code is : import tarfile f = file(rnss-3.12_alpha2.tar.bz2, rb) tar = tarfile.open(fileobj=f, mode=r|bz2) try: for m in tar: tar.extract(m) finally: tar.close() f.close()

[issue1718] Tarfile fails to fully extract tar.bz2/tar.gz package

Changes by Ismail Donmez: -- type: - behavior __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1718 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1718] Tarfile fails to fully extract tar.bz2/tar.gz package

Ismail Donmez added the comment: Argh stupid me, this is due a patch on my side, grr. ı am really sorry. Please close as invalid :( __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1718 __

[issue1718] Tarfile fails to fully extract tar.bz2/tar.gz package

Changes by Guido van Rossum: -- resolution: - invalid status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1718 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue1705] trace module does not annotate global statement

Guido van Rossum added the comment: I don't see a bug here. It is as Amaury explains. -- nosy: +gvanrossum status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1705 __

[issue1702] Word alias used in confusing way to compare open() and file()

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Looks like a doc change that Georg could easily apply. -- assignee: nnorwitz - georg.brandl nosy: +georg.brandl, gvanrossum priority: - low __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1702

[issue1700] Regular Expression inline flags not handled correctly for some unicode characters

Guido van Rossum added the comment: I see this too. Maybe Fredrik understands? -- assignee: - effbot nosy: +effbot, gvanrossum __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1700 __

[issue1707] probable bug in code.py with Python 3.0a2

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Good catch! Committed revision 59659. I wonder how many other places have the same problem... -- nosy: +gvanrossum resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[issue1709] logging: log actual function name

Changes by Guido van Rossum: -- assignee: - vsajip nosy: +vsajip priority: - low __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1709 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue1707] probable bug in code.py with Python 3.0a2

Changes by Andre Roberge: __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1707 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1707] probable bug in code.py with Python 3.0a2

Andre Roberge added the comment: I did a quick search on the *.py files in the distribution. I only found two questionable places. 1. site.py has raw_input (python 2.5, line 311) replaced by the more complicated 3 lines (python 3.0a2, lines 313-315) rather than the simpler one-liner

[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Actually, only the f.close() call should be conditionalized. Does this patch fix the issue for you? -- assignee: - gvanrossum nosy: +gvanrossum priority: - normal Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9040/distutils.diff

[issue1707] probable bug in code.py with Python 3.0a2

Guido van Rossum added the comment: site.py is already fixed in svn; it actually did cause problems, see issue #1667. I fixed pydoc.py. Committed revision 59660. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1707 __

[issue1177] urllib* 20x responses not OK?

Kurt B. Kaiser added the comment: r58207 and r58247 patch logic is reversed. -- assignee: facundobatista - kbk nosy: +kbk resolution: fixed - status: closed - open __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1177

[issue1177] urllib* 20x responses not OK?

Kurt B. Kaiser added the comment: Reversed the logic of the previous patches to urllib.py and added a test case. I noticed the problem when I tried to retrieve a file which required auth. r59661 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __

[issue1696] Distutils ignore dry-run flag at clean-up of distutils.command.build_scripts.copy_scripts

toxik added the comment: It doesn't die now, but AFAICT, it doesn't even try to copy the script now. (With your patch.) I might also add that this is for package_data. __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1696

[issue1719] Cosmetic patch for doc/code mismatch (msilib.UuidCreate)

New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto: Doc says msilib.UUIDCreate(), while code says msilib.UuidCreate() (Case differs) maybe doc is wrong? -- components: Documentation files: msilib.patch messages: 59089 nosy: ocean-city severity: normal status: open title: Cosmetic patch for doc/code

[issue1709] logging: log actual function name

Vinay Sajip added the comment: This must be some kind of SVN issue. Works fine on 2.5.1: Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, May 2 2007, 16:56:35) [GCC 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import logging def myLoggingFunc(): ...