Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Why didn't it link with /usr/lib/libcrypt.so? That has always worked on
Solaris, including Solaris 2.6.
In addition, even if it did decide to use libcrypt.a for some strange
reason, it should still link successfully, since libcrypt.a should
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Can you please report from the mmap man page how anonymous mappings can
be achieved on Solaris 2.6?
--
assignee: - theller
nosy: +loewis, theller
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Why do you think there is a typo? O_RDWR is a valid constant that should
be provided on all Unix-like systems.
Can you please find out from the open(2) man page: a) whether Solaris
2.6 supports the O_RDWR constant, b) what header files to
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
# ar tv /usr/lib/libcrypt.a
rw-rw-r-- 0/1 1296 Jul 16 05:57 1997 crypt.o
rw-rw-r-- 0/1 4996 Jul 16 05:57 1997 cryptio.o
rw-rw-r-- 0/1 1508 Jul 16 05:57 1997 des_encrypt.o
rw-rw-r-- 0/1 5356 Jul 16 05:58 1997 des_crypt.o
# ls -la
New submission from Erick Tryzelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This may be a known consequence of python 3.0, but I couldn't find any
reference to it, nor a test case that covers it. Here's a valid use of yield
in 2.5.1:
def foo():
... x=[(yield x) for x in 1,2,3]
... yield 5
... yield x
New submission from Adam Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
inherit_special contains logic to inherit the base type's tp_basicsize
if the new type doesn't have it set. The logic was spread over several
lines, but actually does almost nothing (presumably an artifact of
previous versions), so here's a
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
A Goggle search gives between many others:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-09/msg00054.html
http://www.ravenbrook.com/project/mps/master/design/vmso/
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/read_mmap.html
Added file:
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.solaris/2004-07/0256.html
http://source.winehq.org/source/libs/wine/mmap.c
I will stop posting URLs. ;-)
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Something must be broken with your system installation. des_crypt.o
should define the function _des_crypt (ar x /usr/lib/libcrypt.a;nm -g
des_crypt.o). What linker are you using?
It seems that the shared version of libcrypt was only added in
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
# ar x /usr/lib/libcrypt.a;nm -g des_crypt.o
U ___errno
033c T _des_crypt
0274 T _des_encrypt
U _des_encrypt1
01b0 T _des_setkey
U _mutex_lock
U _mutex_unlock
U _thr_getspecific
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I will stop posting URLs. ;-)
Thanks. None of the URLs seem to be helpful, anyway.
Please avoid posting URLs without any indication as to what
specific conclusion you like to see drawn from the page.
It seems that Solaris 2.6 just doesn't
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
So adding these two lines helped:
# diff /usr/scratch/Python-2.5.2/Modules/mmapmodule.c.ori
/usr/scratch/Python-2.5.2/Modules/mmapmodule.c
36a37
#include sys/types.h
38a40
#include fcntl.h
#
___
Python
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, but I can only help with testing. :(
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3265
___
___
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ok. I have no further ideas on what the problem might be, but I'm
confident that linking with a different library is not the right thing
to do. Linking with -lcrypt did always work on Solaris 2.6, so I'm not
going to change that.
--
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Could it be the name clashing problem between -lcrypt and -lcrypto?
bash-3.00# ar x /usr/lib/libcrypt.a;nm -g des_crypt.o
U ___errno
033c T _des_crypt
0274 T _des_encrypt
U _des_encrypt1
01b0 T _des_setkey
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
No. We are not linking with libcrypto at all, so there can't be clashes.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3264
___
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
You say did always work?
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-December/177479.html
Maybe the reason why in ruby they forced to -shared flag
because it was possible to link only with the shared library?
I do not know from which
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The two tracebacks provided by Mark seem to correspond to the following
python stack (innermost last):
Lib/test/test_multiprocessing.py, line 1005, in _test_map_unordered
self.assertEqual(sorted(it), map(sqr, range(1000)))
Ismail Donmez [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The test hanged for me at first try but worked fine on the second test,
weird.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3088
___
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ah, ok. I completely missed the point of the error message (i.e.
relocations remain), and misinterpreted it as missing symbols.
So I still recommend doing what I recommended back then: Uncomment the
line in Modules/Setup to build the crypt
Martin Mokrejs [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Confirming the enabling line 216 like below helped. Thanks. Maybe change
Resolution?
204 # Socket module helper for SSL support; you must comment out the
other
205 # socket line above, and possibly edit the SSL variable:
206
Paul Melis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On a Linux system (FC4) with r64686 of the Py3k branch I also still get
occassional hangs (with ./python -E -bb ./Lib/test/regrtest.py -v
test_multiprocessing). Mostly this seems to occur with the very first
test executed, i.e. before any of the
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Please see the top of platform.py:
#This module is maintained by Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED].
#If you find problems, please submit bug reports/patches via the
#Python SourceForge Project Page and assign them to
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Also note that linux_distribution() will use the parsed distro name from
the release file per default (full_distribution_name=1), so the problem
described in the original ticket description should no longer be
relevant: all release files
Mark Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Are you sure that's right? That traceback has no mention of
PyObject_Malloc or obmalloc.c.
So now I think that the traceback was right. There was no mention of
PyObject_Malloc or obmalloc.c because the traceback only showed 1 of the 9
Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This may be as documented but it's *extremely* counter intuitive and
seems to go against the grain of where python is headed.
(remember that whole struggle to get 3/2 = 1.5 rather 3/2=1? ;-) )
I've changed the type to feature request, what's
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
As far as deque goes, the following behaviour on the trunk is the
problem I am trying to fix:
Python 2.6b1+ (trunk:64655, Jul 2 2008, 22:48:24)
[GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
To be valid, your analogy between dates and numbers suggests that a date
should be convertible to the datetime with the same date, at midnight.
And both objects compare equal, just like 42==42.0
But today this is not the case: it's hard
New submission from Neven Goršić [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
strptime() allows 60 and 61 sec, but not 62 sec in arg. string
s='02/28/2000 12:33:61 AM'
time.strptime(s,'%m/%d/%Y %I:%M:%S %p')
(2000, 2, 28, 0, 33, 61, 0, 59, -1)
s='02/28/2000 12:33:62 AM'
time.strptime(s,'%m/%d/%Y %I:%M:%S %p')
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks for the patch. This is now committed as r64688
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1622
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch for issue1622 was committed as r64688; closing this patch as
outdated.
--
nosy: +loewis
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This is because list comprehensions are implemented as functions in 3.0
so their scope is not leaked out to the rest of the function.
Here is the bytecode for 2.6:
dis.dis(f)
2 0 BUILD_LIST 0
3
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch in #1622 was committed as r64688.
--
nosy: +loewis
resolution: duplicate - fixed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1746
New submission from Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Per mail thread:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-June/080497.html
Attached is the patch to connection.py to drop the fqdn call.
Final suggestion from Trent:
This is a common problem. Binding to '127.0.0.1' will bind to
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Minutes with 61 (0..60) and 62 (0..61) seconds are used to adjust the
theoretical calendar because of small differences with real world
rotation...
Are you aware of any case where a minute with 63 seconds (0..62) should
be used?
--
Robert Schuppenies [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Amaury,
I was testing your patch and it turns out, that it will ignore
any __sizeof__ attribute which may be available through getattr. I
adapted it a bit, so now getsizeof will try to call the method on the
passed object first, and if it
Changes by Kevin Watters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +kevinwatters
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3258
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Neven Goršić [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thank you for your reply, although is not helpful for me.
I use strptime() for datedate transformation and datatime boundaries
checking
and therefore I am not conserned in Reltivity theory.
When someone in datetime table enter 02:61:38 it is
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Closing as invalid, two reasons:
- Your original issue was that time.strptime() didn't allow 62 seconds,
not that it allowed 60 or 61.
- If you use it to validate input... how do you actually know that
03/25/2012 17:13:61 AM' is an invalid
New submission from vizcayno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For Win XP SP3 I do next in py30.b1:
a=[9,8,1,2]
it=iter(a)
it.next()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
AttributeError: 'list_iterator' object has no attribute 'next'
but doing:
it.__next__()
9
it.__next__()
8
it
New submission from Andrii V. Mishkovskyi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
multiprocessing uses a lot of `assert` statements all over the code. I
propose to change this way to a more readable and understandable. For
example:
Lib/multiprocessing/managers.py, line 136:
assert isinstance(authkey, bytes)
From my
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
What I don't understand here is... if gethostbyname() lacks of IPv6
support, instead of creating a new function why not to add the
functionality to that same function?
Right now gethostbyname() is implemented in C, which would be the
drawback
Changes by Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1424152
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file10632/unnamed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1424152
___
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Yes, this change in semantics is expected. Closing as won't fix.
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I see that you're working on a final solution, this is great!
What we would need also to incorporate this to the trunk is a patch for
the test suite. Senthil, could you handle this?
--
assignee: - facundobatista
nosy:
Changes by Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - facundobatista
nosy: +facundobatista, orsenthil
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2916
___
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
BitTorment, what would increase the possibility of accepting this is a
patch also for the test suite (test_urllib2.py), checking this
behaviour, for us to be sure that does not break again in the future.
Could you please submit also this?
Changes by Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - facundobatista
nosy: +facundobatista, orsenthil
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2776
___
New submission from Daniel Stutzbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm writing a C extension module and discovered that Py_CLEAR() causes a
crash if the programmer happened to name their variable tmp. The
Py_CLEAR() macro internally uses the name tmp in a new scope, hiding
the callers tmp, and calling
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
We are actually closing the socket before returning in the latest
version of asyncore. Closing as fixed.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed in trunk, will be fixed in 3.0 this weekend.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1736101
___
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed in trunk, will be fixed in 3.0 this weekend.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue889153
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed in trunk, will be fixed in 3.0 this weekend.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1740572
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have applied my variant patch to trunk, which will be in 3.0 this weekend.
--
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Fixed in trunk, will be fixed in 3.0 this weekend.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1025525
Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Committed to trunk a bit ago, will be in 3.0 this weekend.
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1736190
Changes by Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - facundobatista
nosy: +facundobatista
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2464
___
George Boutsioukis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I have also come across this in the past. Although I sense that some
obscure reason might prevent time arithmetic from being included, here's
a patch to add time/timedelta addition and subtraction. It closely
follows the datetime arithmetic
Changes by Josiah Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
status: pending - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2808
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Senthil: We would need some tests to assure this will keep working ok in
the future
Also as this is (somehow) a new functionality, we'd need to modify the
NEWS file and maybe even the docs (a comment about this case insensitivity?
Could you
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Where in the 3.0 docs do you see it.next() used? It should be changed.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3271
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Senthil, we should incorporate the tests from RFC 3986 to the test
suite, what do you think?
Coul we integrate the effort from Paul Jimenez and the current urlparse
and achieve a RFC compliant library? Should we handle this compliance in
this
vizcayno [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Please, go to python 3.0 - python manuals and search with word: iter
then select first line of found titles, i.e. Functional Programming
HOWTO. Into this title you will find some samples.
Regards,
___
Python
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
fixed in r64696.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3271
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3271
___
New submission from Daniel Colascione [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Consider:
import dis
def foo():
if 0 and 1: return hi
dis.dis(foo)
What I get is
2 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (0)
3 JUMP_IF_FALSE 15 (to 21)
6 POP_TOP
7
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
A patch for this was just recently rejected. See #1394.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'd like to reopen this. I'm still in favor of something like to this
algorithm:
def float_repr(x):
s = %.16g % x
if float(s) != x:
s = %.17g % x
s1 = s
if s1.startswith('-'):
s1 = s[1:]
if s1.isdigit():
s += '.0' #
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Raymond, Mark? Is a new patch with tests and docs forthcoming? Have
you decided on the API yet? I'm willing to approve this for beta 2,
which will be around July 15.
--
assignee: gvanrossum - rhettinger
New submission from toxik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Presently it's impossible to use httplib.HTTPConnection.request and send
the several headers with the same name. This is because _send_request
assumes a dict is passed in, or a dict-like interface. Obviously one could
make a list subclass or some
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
If you think using 16 (when possible) will stop complaints, think again
;-) For example,
for x in 0.07, 0.56:
... putatively_improved_repr = %.16g % x
... assert float(putatively_improved_repr) == x
... print putatively_improved_repr
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
components: +Library (Lib)
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3277
___
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When the SO_OOBINLINE option is used against a socket, out-of-band data
should be placed in the normal data input stream as it is received.
In fact this is what happens on Windows and Linux by using the script below.
On FreeBSD this does
Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This bug should be strictly related with issue 3277:
http://bugs.python.org/issue3277
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3278
___
Giampaolo Rodola' [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This bug should be strictly related with issue 3278:
http://bugs.python.org/issue3278
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3277
___
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
That is truly maddening! :-(
I guess Noam's proposal to return str(x) if float(str(x)) == x makes
more sense then. I don't really care as much about 1.234567890123 vs.
1.234567890122 as I care about 1.2345 vs. 1.2344.
(This
Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Why do you think this is a bug in Python, and not in FreeBSD?
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3277
___
78 matches
Mail list logo
