Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
This really belongs to python-list rather than the tracker. It is not
correct that with shell=False Popen reuses the thread of control of the
calling process. You seem to be confusing blocking and reusing the
thread of
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com added the comment:
I do have an issue with the patch's startup code. The prototype for
the thread entry should be DWORD WINAPI function(PVOID);. The
important distinction is the WINAPI part, which resolves to __stdcall
but doesn't have to. I know that
New submission from Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com:
There are several checks like GetVersion() 0x8000 that try to
determine whether there is support for the WCHAR versions of the win32
API. Since all support for MS Windows 95, 98 and ME has been dropped,
all supported systems
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com added the comment:
You're right, Kristján, sorry for the noise. Shouldn't make claims
before being fully awake
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3582
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
As Alexander says: a shell command can spawn any number of subprocesses,
or none at all (if e.g. only shell builtins are called).
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment:
Thanks.
What do you mean by making the test a method of TestCAPI? I have found
no such class. Are you talking about the python part or the c part?
Also, atomicity in the callback is not required, as the callback is
never
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Martin, do you want to make the call on this one?
--
assignee: - loewis
nosy: +loewis, rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2897
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Am closing this one. It is pointless and counter-productive unless
there is a firm decision that % formatting is definitely going away (and
migration tools have been developed). Right now, it looks like there is
some chance
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I agree with Alexander; the header shouldn't be included into Python.h
as-is.
I would propose to eliminate it eventually, with the following steps:
1. move PyMemberDef and the function declarations into object.h
2. (simultaneously) introduce
Dominique Wahli dwa...@gmail.com added the comment:
What happened ???
I'm pretty sure the fix was committed in 2.6.0 and, as saying by Amaury
in comments, the test script running fine.
In 2.6.1 test is broken.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Making it static is fine. I don't recall what kind of customization I
did when I introduced it.
I'm skeptical about the entire issue, though. Why is it that these
variables should be prefixed? I disagree that all names need to be
prefixed:
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-05 22:06, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Given that you can build Python as library on Unix and as DLL on
Windows, there doesn't appear to be any need to
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-06 11:28, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Making it static is fine. I don't recall what kind of customization I
did when I introduced it.
I'm skeptical about the entire issue,
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
+1
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4856
___
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
[Mark]
inputs with a special real or imaginary component. On balance, I'd
support making complex('nan + nan*j') do the right thing.
Having thought about this a bit more, I take this back. Some reasons are
given below.
[David]
-
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Christian, any comments? Is it okay to close this as a 'won't fix'?
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2121
___
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com added the comment:
This patch removes all calls to win32's GetVersion() where they are used
to detect NT. In posixmodule.c it was used by a wrapper function that
cached the result, which then also became obsolete.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
For completeness
I don't think completeness is a useful thing to have here.
and to make things easier for all developers,
It is not easier, but more difficult. It now requires a change,
whereas leaving things as-is requires no change.
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-06 13:28, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
For completeness
I don't think completeness is a useful thing to have here.
and to make things easier for all developers,
It is not
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment:
Ok, I have addressed the issues raised about testcapi. A new file has
been submitted.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12619/testcapi.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from jura jur...@narod.ru:
the following code produces syntax error:
(x, y) += 1
While this is documented in
http://docs.python.org/3.0/reference/simple_stmts.html#augmented-assignment-statements
(An augmented assignment evaluates the target (which, unlike normal
аssignment
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Extract of the grammar:
target ::= identifier | ...
target_list ::= target (, target)* [,]
assignment_stmt ::= (target_list =)+ ...
augmented_assignment_stmt ::= target augop ...
augop
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I'm only referring to exported symbols. Static globals, of course,
don't need such a prefix.
Ok, the symbols in question are not exported from pythonxy.dll.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
jura jur...@narod.ru added the comment:
Yes, but
target ::= identifier | ( target_list ) | ...
so (x,y) seems to be a valid target.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4857
___
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Oh yes! I didn't see ( target_list ) | [ target_list ], sorry.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4857
___
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
FWIW, I have made a quick attempt at removing the f-f_lasti assignment
in the few places where it could be removed, but it didn't make a
difference on my machine. The problem being that there are very few
places where it is legitimate to remove
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Martin v. Löwis rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
It is not easier, but more difficult. It now requires a change,
whereas leaving things as-is requires no change.
I actually agree with
Cournapeau David da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp added the comment:
@ Mark
Concerning float('inf') * 1j: you're right, my rambling did not make any
sense, sorry.
I agree that adding complexity may be a good reason to warrant an
arbitrary feature; actually, I did not manage to handle nan/inf at
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Ok, the test patch is fine!
Now looking at the main patch, some comments:
- you removed volatile from pendingfirst and pendinglast, is it really
safe?
- what if pending_lock is not initialized when Py_AddPendingCall is
called? I know it's
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Marc-Andre Lemburg
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
I don't follow you: those symbols are not meant for public use anyway,
so we can easily change them without any costs. The same goes for
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Mark, I'm somewhat uncomfortable with your proposal also. It changes
what the parser will accept and the potential benefits are almost nil.
Also, putting NaNs and Infs in complex numbers is probably not something
that should
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
The patch looks fine to me, apart from one point: the return value of
PyThread_allocate_lock() should be checked for NULL, and the error
either propagated or cleared.
(I'd also suggest lowering HASHLIB_GIL_MINSIZE to 2048 or 4196)
Gregory,
Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org added the comment:
hashlibopenssl_small_lock-4.diff looks good to me.
I also agree that HASHLIB_GIL_MINSIZE should be lowered to 2048.
Commit it, and please backport it to trunk before closing this bug.
--
nosy: -gps
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1
darrenr python-roun...@dranalli.com added the comment:
Regardless of the type of algorithm used by the garbage collector that
currently exists in Python, its worst-case performance is undesirable. I
have some interest in implementing a garbage collector for Python with
improved performance
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
The proposed patch appears to give up sorting by key,value altogether if
there are a few incomparable items. It would be better to group items by
type and sort within each group. For example,
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Committed to trunk and py3k, and backported to 2.6 and 3.0. Thanks!
--
resolution: accepted - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1180193
Changes by Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12587/hashlibopenssl_small_lock-4.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4751
___
Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de added the comment:
PyThread_allocate_lock can fail without interference. object-lock will
stay NULL and the GIL is simply not released.
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4751
New submission from Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de:
MD5 is one of the most popular cryptographic hash-functions around,
mainly for it's good performance and availability throughout
applications and libraries. The MD5 algorithm is currently implemented
in python as part of the
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-06 21:06, Lukas Lueg wrote:
MD5 is one of the most popular cryptographic hash-functions around,
mainly for it's good performance and availability throughout
applications and libraries. The MD5 algorithm is currently implemented
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Because MD5 is used widely, Python needs to support it, if only to be
able to verify MD5 signatures when offered.
--
nosy: +rhettinger
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Looking at the patch, the recorded seek points will probably be wrong if
some newlines were translated (e.g. '\r\n' - '\n') when reading the file.
I'm also not sure not what the use case for very big files is. linecache
is primarily used for
Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org added the comment:
The hashlib docs already mention the problems with md5 et al via a
bright red:
Warning
Some algorithms have known hash collision weaknesses, see the FAQ at the
end.
thanks for closing this. not gonna happen.
--
nosy:
New submission from David Watson bai...@users.sourceforge.net:
The pwd (and spwd and grp) modules deal with data from
/etc/passwd (and/or other sources) that can be supplied by users
on the system. Specifically, users can often change the data in
their GECOS fields without the OS requiring that
Changes by David Watson bai...@users.sourceforge.net:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12622/minor.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4859
___
Changes by David Watson bai...@users.sourceforge.net:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12623/latin1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4859
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment:
This was corrected a long time ago in r37372
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
superseder: - configure not able to find ncurses/curses in Solaris
umaxx um...@oleco.net added the comment:
Looking at the patch, the recorded seek points will probably be wrong if
some newlines were translated (e.g. '\r\n' - '\n') when reading the file.
ack, this could be a problem.
I'm also not sure not what the use case for very big files is.
this is
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org added the comment:
This also happens with Python 2.5.2 (not the latest 2.5 series, I know)
on AIX 6.1.
--
nosy: +darkside
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4026
Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de added the comment:
As I already said to Raymond: At least we should update the
documentation. The FAQ currently linked is from 2005.
The CERT-Advisory from provides a clean and simple language: In 2008,
researchers demonstrated the practical vulnerability
Kristján Valur Jónsson krist...@ccpgames.com added the comment:
1) volatile is not required when access is guarded by locks.
2) pendingcalls_to_do is initialized to 1, so the very first thing that
the interpreter does (after executing one bytecode, I init _PyTicker to
0 now) is to initialize
New submission from Noufal nou...@nibrahim.net.in:
If a cookie is created with a character in the content, the js_output
which is emitted is bad javascript. eg.
import Cookie
c=Cookie.Cookie('Customer=WILE_E_COYOTE; Version=1; Path=/acme')
print c
Set-Cookie: Customer=WILE_E_COYOTE;
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-06 22:42, Lukas Lueg wrote:
Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de added the comment:
As I already said to Raymond: At least we should update the
documentation. The FAQ currently linked is from 2005.
The CERT-Advisory from
New submission from Matthias Klose d...@debian.org:
there are some problems with ctypes.util.find_library(), which I would
like to see fixed on active branches.
- find_library is not robust, if either objdump or gcc are not
installed. fixed by raising an exception if the tools are not
Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de added the comment:
It might be a good idea to remove the word secure from the
hashlib documentation, since security of these algorithms is
always limited to a certain period of time.
I'm sorry, was that a boy attempted humor ? [Misuse quote from DH3:
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Secure hash or cryptographic hash is the correct term and I think we
should leave that in, if only to make the original intent clear and to
make them easier to search for.
I propose adding a sentence to the first paragraph
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
On 2009-01-06 23:10, Lukas Lueg wrote:
Lukas Lueg knabberknusperh...@yahoo.de added the comment:
It might be a good idea to remove the word secure from the
hashlib documentation, since security of these algorithms is
always limited to a
New submission from Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com:
First write a utf-16 file with its signature:
f1 = open('utf16.txt', 'w', encoding='utf-16')
f1.write('0123456789')
f1.close()
Then read it twice:
f2 = open('utf16.txt', 'r', encoding='utf-16')
print('read1', ascii(f2.read()))
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' billiej...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3823
___
New submission from Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com:
I was just poking around the distutils documentation and came across the
distutils.mwerkscompiler module. Surely that can't be useful anymore, can
it? The doc reads, in its entirety:
Contains MWerksCompiler, an implementation of the
New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
Currently, test_msvc9compiler fails on VC6 with following message.
//
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test_distutils.py, line 17, in module
test_main()
File
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file12628/test_msvc9compiler.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4864
___
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto ocean-c...@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12629/test_msvc9compiler.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4864
___
Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso p.giarru...@gmail.com added the comment:
@pitrou:
ranting mode
Argh, reference counting hinders even that?
/ranting mode
I just discovered another problem caused by refcounting.
Various techniques allow to create binary code from the interpreter
binary, by just
64 matches
Mail list logo
