Mark Hammond mhamm...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Should the DeprecationWarning for splitunc be a PendingDeprectionWarning
for 3.1 and get 'upgraded' in 3.2?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org added the comment:
I don't know what would be proper, but I'm happy to change it if you
think that's best.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5799
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Nitpicking: I suggest renaming one class used in testing from CtorRaises
to InitRaises, since __init__ is not a constructor (and the meaning of
“Ctor” is not that obvious :)
--
nosy: +Merwok
___
Python
Changes by Senthil orsent...@gmail.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1368312
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Mark Hammond mhamm...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
This looks good to me.
My take on Guido's earlier notes are that they caused a problem in
practice, and the philosophical concerns added justification for
removing it. I'm yet to meet a Windows user with a philosophical
objection
Cournapeau David da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp added the comment:
The toolchain is difficult to build, but the patch is easy to review, it
just moves the MS_WIN64 outside the MS compiler specific part. If it
does not break the MS toolchain (the one used to build the official
python), I don't see
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven asmo...@in-nomine.org added the comment:
Committed the initial patch in r72375 for trunk and r72376 for py3k.
Any other branches that would need the merge? 3.0?
--
resolution: - accepted
stage: test needed - committed/rejected
status: open - pending
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
