Changes by Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net:
--
assignee: rhettinger -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1182143
___
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
The basic problem here is that the one obvious way to some people
(including me and Martin v. Löwis) is to use a dictionary. Further,
there is the problem of conflating types in a user's mind -- right now,
dictionaries are
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
If I understand correctly, using lib32 or lib64 is a kludge. Debian
and Ubuntu want to come up with a better way to do this:
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/MultiArch
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec
Kind regards.
--
nosy:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Closing as resolved, then.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7265
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
I don't want to pollute python-dev with more hopeless ideas, but I wonder
if itertools could grow an efficient C-implemented
def first(collection):
return next(iter(collection))
On the other hand, it probably belongs
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
After a long discussion on python-dev, this proposal is rejected in
favor of adding documentation notes on the ways to non-destructively
retrieve an arbitrary item from a set or frozenset.
Here is an except from the end of
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Raymond Hettinger
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
The basic problem here is that the one obvious way to some people
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
That is a false optimization. Regular python code is full of look-ups
(even set.add has a getattr(s, 'add') lookup just to find the
add-method; every call to a built-in typically goes through multiple
lookups). Also, the
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment:
I agree with Raymond here. This use case isn't special enough, or the
performance of the current one way to do it bad enough to warrant
changing set. I recommend closing this issue.
--
nosy: +eric.smith
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Raymond Hettinger
rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
..
Martin has already rejected a similar proposal for similar reasons.
Please drop this one.
Sure. In fact I've never proposed to apply
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Thank you.
--
resolution: - rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7224
___
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
I think we need someone with access to windows to propose a patch.
--
assignee: benjamin.peterson -
components: +Windows
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from flashk fla...@gmail.com:
I recently ran 2to3 on some of my scripts and noticed a change in behavior.
I had a script that used the built-in execfile function. After the conversion,
it was
changed to manually open the file and read the contents into the exec function.
Now I
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
Could you attach the files separately or paste them into the bug? zip
files are hard to work with.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by flashk fla...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15268/test.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7268
___
___
Changes by flashk fla...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15269/execfile_example.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7268
___
Changes by flashk fla...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15270/execfile_example_converted.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7268
___
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
I just attached the files individually.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7268
___
___
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
test.py is invalid Python 3 syntax.
--
resolution: - invalid
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7268
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
I'm running this code under 2.6, so the print statement should not be the
issue. I've attached a new version of test.py that simply performs a
variable assignment and I still get the syntax error on both 2.6 and 3.1
with the exec function. Also, the
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
assignee: - pitrou
components: -Interpreter Core
stage: patch review - needs patch
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3001
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
This is because you have DOS newlines which the Python compiler cannot
handle. In 2.x, open(test.py, r) does not translate newlines. In
3.x, it does.
--
___
Python tracker
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, I converted test.py to use Unix style newlines and still get the
syntax error on both 2.6 and 3.1. I'm confused as to why execfile works on
the file but reading the contents and passing it to exec behaves
differently under 2.6. Sorry if I'm just
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2009/11/5 flashk rep...@bugs.python.org:
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, I converted test.py to use Unix style newlines and still get the
syntax error on both 2.6 and 3.1. I'm confused as to why execfile works on
the
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, but why am I still getting a syntax error in both 2.6 and 3.1 on the
file, even after converting the newlines?
If I remove the trailing indentation then everything works properly on 2.6
and 3.1, even with DOS newlines.
It just seems that exec
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment:
2009/11/5 flashk rep...@bugs.python.org:
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ok, but why am I still getting a syntax error in both 2.6 and 3.1 on the
file, even after converting the newlines?
If I remove the trailing
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
The deadlock error is still there, so I'm leaving this open, but it is
no longer causing buildbot instability.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6462
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
keywords: -buildbot
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6462
___
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Benjamin disabled this test on windows so it is no longer causing the
buildbot to fail.
--
components: +Tests
keywords: +easy -buildbot
nosy: +r.david.murray
priority: normal - low
stage: - needs patch
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
keywords: -buildbot
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3892
___
___
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
keywords: +buildbot
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6748
___
___
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Benjamin Peterson rep...@bugs.python.orgwrote:
Well, it works for me with the empty newline. Can you isolate the exact
problem?
For me, the exact problem seems to be that exec raises a SyntaxError if the
code
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
When ~/.local/lib was chosen for the user directory, the BaseDir Spec
was given as prior example. Why not go the full way and follow the spec?
The config file could be $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/python/distutils, with
$XDG_CONFIG_HOME defaulting to
flashk fla...@gmail.com added the comment:
I noticed that calling exec('\t') raises a SyntaxError, so maybe this is
the root of the problem. I manually added a newline character to the end
of the file contents and it fixes the issue for me:
exec(compile(open('test.py').read()+'\n', 'test.py',
34 matches
Mail list logo
