Aviram added the comment:
I sent it to sig-capi -
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/capi-...@python.org/thread/T6DHEKHKKZIYU2GEPGHUQJ3DHTJXZGWW/
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
Aviram added the comment:
Sure, I will do so. The proposal should be written here, right?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46376>
___
___
Aviram added the comment:
I agree that a developer should and would prefer the `Py_TPFLAGS_*` but when
you visit https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/sequence.html
It seems like the best practice to determine Sequence protocol is by using this
function, hence leading to confusion. There's
Aviram added the comment:
I submitted a draft patch. Using TPFlags alone doesn't cut it as some types are
excluded (bytes, str, bytearray) in sequence and same for mapping. I'm thinking
of checking for those cases specifically as those are very very specific
casings. Would love some input
Change by Aviram :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +28799
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30600
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Aviram added the comment:
Would checking the TPFLAGS for `Py_TPFLAGS_SEQUENCE` & `Py_TPFLAGS_MAPPING`
when using `PySequence_Check` & `PyMapping_Check` be a valid fix?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org
Aviram added the comment:
https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3/issues/2072 Relevant discussion in PyO3 related
issue
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
Change by Aviram :
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, bukzor, georg.brandl, jmillikin, levkivskyi,
miss-islington, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue46
New submission from Aviram :
This is re-open of https://bugs.python.org/issue5945.
In the former issue, it was decided that documenting the odd behavior and later
providing clean, good ABC C API would be the long term solution.
Few years passed and there are no alternatives AFAIK
I am
Aviram added the comment:
Hi all,
still waiting for review.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40001>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Aviram :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +aviramha
nosy_count: 1.0 -> 2.0
pull_requests: +18411
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19058
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/i
New submission from Aviram :
SimpleCookie (http/cookies.py) load method fails if one of the has an issue.
In real life scenarios, we want to be tolerant toward faulty cookies, and just
ignore those.
My suggestion is to add ignore_errors keyword argument to the load method of
SimpleCookie
12 matches
Mail list logo
