Clinton Roy added the comment:
Not that I can see, or remember. Revised patch attached. Tyop fixed as well.
Please note there seem to be some issues with svn head atm,
pyconfig.h.in and configure would seem to be out of whack with
configure.in, this patch does not include changes to those
Clinton Roy added the comment:
Hi Sol,
It's just a data file I suppose, Python should not need a dependency on
pkg-config, and neither should there be a python-pkgconfig package that
just contains the python.pc file.
I think the approach to just always install the python.pc file is the
Clinton Roy added the comment:
Oh, you meant for me to reply =)
- Do all unix-like system support pkg-config?
Yes. It even works on windows.
- Is $(LIBDIR)/pkgconfig the only choice for installing this file?
While pkg-config can be told to look in other directories for pc files
(via
Clinton Roy added the comment:
Is there anything I can do to move this forward at all?
cheers,
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3585>
___
___
Python-bug
Clinton Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
This version sets Libs.private for static compiles.
Any chance this will make it into the 2.6/3.0 release candidates ?
cheers,
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11368/pkgconfig.diff
___
Python t
Clinton Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Thanks for the comments Amaury, this patch uses ${VERSION} throughout so
that it can be applied across branches.
cheers,
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11152/pkgconfig.diff
___
Python t
New submission from Clinton Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This patch adds pkg-config support to the python build, a python.pc file
is installed in the pkgconfig directory such that autoconf buildsystems
can trivially link against the python library.
Diff made against revision
