Changes by David Benbennick :
--
nosy: +dbenbenn
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19055>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
David Benbennick added the comment:
Okay, I see what the comment is saying now. I was mistaken.
It might make the statement clearer if it is made more precise. "rather small"
is vague. That vagueness is intentional, but it makes it more confusing.
--
status: open
New submission from David Benbennick:
Since Python 2.1 [1], when random.shuffle was added, the documentation has said:
"""Note that for even rather small len(x), the total number of permutations of
x is larger than the period of most random number generators; this imp
