[issue21657] pip.get_installed_distributions() Does not return packages in the current working directory

David Fraser added the comment: Filed with pypa at https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/3091 -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue21

[issue11629] Reference implementation for PEP 397

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11629> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue8863] Display Python backtrace on SIGSEGV, SIGFPE and fatal error

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8863> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue7989] Add pure Python implementation of datetime module to CPython

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7989> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue7980] time.strptime not thread safe

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7980> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue8032] Add gdb7 hooks to make it easier to debug Python

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8032> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue6132] Implement the GIL with critical sections in Windows

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6132> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue3871] cross and native build of python for mingw32 with distutils

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue3871> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue6689] subprocess doesn't pass arguments correctly on Linux when shell=True

Changes by David Fraser : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14698/current-3.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6689> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue6689] subprocess doesn't pass arguments correctly on Linux when shell=True

Changes by David Fraser : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file14697/current-2.6.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6689> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue6689] subprocess doesn't pass arguments correctly on Linux when shell=True

David Fraser added the comment: Ah, upon closer inspection - the special parameters $0 $1 $2 etc mentioned in the sh docs refer to parameters within the command string, so that: sh -c 'echo $2 $0 $1' run for "the people" produces: the people run for So the correct pat

[issue6689] subprocess doesn't pass arguments correctly on Linux when shell=True

Changes by David Fraser : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14698/current-3.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6689> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list m

[issue6689] subprocess doesn't pass arguments correctly on Linux when shell=True

New submission from David Fraser : (from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1253122/why-does-subprocess-popen-with-shelltrue-work-differently-on-linux-vs-windows/1254322) When using subprocess.Popen(args, shell=True) to run "gcc --version" (just as an example), on Windows we get this:

[issue2304] subprocess under windows fails to quote properly when shell=True

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue2304> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue5482] RFC: improve distutils bdist_rpm so it builds pure python modules as single packages that works across architectures

Changes by David Fraser : -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue5482> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue2736] datetime needs and "epoch" method

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: - "STINNER Victor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > STINNER Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Timedelta formats: > > (a) Win64: 64 bits unsigned integer, number of 1/10 microsecon

[issue2736] datetime needs and "epoch" method

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: - "Alexander Belopolsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the > comment: > > I would like to voice my opposition the totimestamp method. > > Rep

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: So I've got a follow-up patch that adds tp_unicode. Caveat that I've never done anything like this before and it's almost certain to be wrong. It does however generate the desired result in this case :-) Added file: h

[issue1551432] __unicode__ breaks for exception class objects

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Note that this causes problems with converting Exceptions to unicode - see http://bugs.python.org/issue2517 -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Aha - the __unicode__ method was previously there in Python 2.5, and was ripped out because of the unicode(Exception) problem. See http://bugs.python.org/issue1551432. The reversion is in http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/O

[issue2517] Error when printing an exception containing a Unicode string

Changes by David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +davidfraser ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2517> ___ __

[issue2809] string docstring doesn't mention that ' '.split() != ' '.split(' ')

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Yes that's fantastic, thanks :-) __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2809> __ ___ Python

[issue2809] string docstring doesn't mention that ' '.split() != ' '.split(' ')

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I don't think this really addresses the issue properly... The original docstring read: +Note that not specifying sep (or using None) will cause\n\ +empty strings to be removed from the output. thus ' '.strip()\n\ +return

[issue2736] datetime needs and "epoch" method

Changes by David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- nosy: +davidfraser __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2736> __ ___ Python-bugs

[issue1777412] Python's strftime dislikes years before 1900

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Which version of Python are you using? I could have sworn we just fixed this problem in CVS a couple weeks ago. This was on the latest Python 2.6 svn... but looking at the py3k branch with viewsvn the code is definitely still

[issue1777412] Python's strftime dislikes years before 1900

David Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I have a patch for this, but I don't know which platforms have the problem. On Linux, strftime seems to work fine. Attaching the patch as a work in progress... -- keywords: +patch nosy: +davidfraser Added file: http://bugs