Changes by Frank van Dijk fwvd...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36273/codecsopen2a.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22128
Changes by Frank van Dijk fwvd...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36274/codecsopen3a.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22128
Frank van Dijk added the comment:
Marc-Andre Lemburg added the comment:
Pointing people to io.open() as alternative to codecs.open() is a good idea,
but that doesn't make codecs.open() less useful.
The reason why codecs.open() uses binary mode is to avoid issues with
automatic newline
New submission from Frank van Dijk:
stackoverflow.com has a zillion answers recommending the use of codecs.open()
as a unicode capable drop in replacement for open(). This probably means that
there is still a lot of code being written that uses codecs.open(). That's bad
thing because
Changes by Frank van Dijk fwvd...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36235/codecsopen3.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22128
