James Kyle added the comment:
I think Ned does have some good points regarding the minimal impact a reversion
would have.
The most poignant point is that /Library/ on OS X is not a user controlled
directory whereas ~/.local is. If ~/.local exists and has packages installed,
it's becaus
James Kyle added the comment:
Fair enough. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15048>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
James Kyle added the comment:
Am I missing something or were the problems delineated in issue #4865 solvable
by simply sys.path.append("/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages")?
What would the process be for reopening this issue for discussion?
I'm not sure this is the right way
New submission from James Kyle :
This behavior is present on OS X 10.7 and framework builds.
In this case, the /Library/Python/ paths are included in every
install.
I would consider this behavior non-standard as in most manual python installs
only that installations library paths are
