John Runyon added the comment:
New proposed patch.
I understand not wanting to document an "internal only name", except that in
this case it rather needs to be documented. I would strongly prefer Angad's
patch to mine because you do, at times, need to know the actual name of t
John Runyon added the comment:
*bump*.
This flat-out wrong documentation has already misled several people, and has
had a proposed patch with no comments for over a year.
--
nosy: +jrunyon
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20
John Runyon added the comment:
This is a duplicate of 20468, which has a patch submitted (over a year ago).
--
nosy: +jrunyon
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24
John Runyon added the comment:
Concise documentation isn't my forte, but my confusion would've been avoided
with a note that "for historical reasons, threading.Timer is actually a factory
function for the underlying class threading._Timer" or somethin
New submission from John Runyon:
the documentation
(https://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html#threading.Timer) lists
"threading.Timer" as a class. It is not, which means that (for example) you can
not use it in isinstance(). "threading._Timer" is a clas
