Mark Smith added the comment:
Added a patch to increase code coverage for the pulldom module to 90%.
This patch also includes 3 'expectedFailure' tests that I believe indicate
erroneous behaviour, associated with issues #9453 (SAX2DOM doesn't like
processing instructions
Mark Smith added the comment:
Closed this issue. The initial report was in error -- it turns out I can't even
read my own console. I'm an idiot :)
--
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.pyth
Mark Smith added the comment:
Removed the failing test patch, because it didn't demonstrate what I thought it
did. Unwrapped tests also don't have docstrings, because they are instances of
the TestCase, not references to th
Changes by Mark Smith :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18321/unittest_failing_test.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9454>
___
___
Python-bug
Mark Smith added the comment:
Provided a patch to demonstrate this issue.
Demonstrates that docstrings aren't copied to the decorator function.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18321/unittest_failing_test.patch
___
P
New submission from Mark Smith :
When running tests with -v, the test runner prints out the docstring of each
test method, if present, and falls back to the method name if it's not present.
Test methods wrapped with @expectedFailure do not print out their docstring, so
it looks lik
Mark Smith added the comment:
My recommendation is that SAX2DOM is deprecated and removed from the standard
library rather than fixing this issue. The class is currently undocumented, has
weird behaviour, and is unused within the Python standard library, so I don't
expect that this
New submission from Mark Smith :
pulldom.SAX2DOM raises a TypeError if it encounters a processing instruction
before the root element of an XML document.
It is valid to have a processing instruction before the root node of a document
(and SAX2DOM's superclass, PullDOM supports this), so
Changes by Mark Smith :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18179/7635.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7635>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Mark Smith added the comment:
Terry, thanks for the feedback!
I have added a patch, replacing the previous one, which deals with your points
1 and 3 in the following ways:
1. I have used (an edited form of) your synopsis - I've removed the details of
exactly what is returned fro
Mark Smith added the comment:
I should have mentioned: __iter__ is already implemented, and works as expected.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9
New submission from Mark Smith :
pulldom has poor code coverage, so I am currently implementing thorough unit
tests for it.
--
components: XML
messages: 111476
nosy: mark.smith
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: pulldom has low code coverage
versions: Python 3.2
New submission from Mark Smith :
DOMEventStream implements __getitem__, but ignores the index/key that is passed
in and simply returns the next item from the stream. This is seriously
unexpected behaviour.
I don't believe this functionality can be sensibly implemented in this class,
and
New submission from Mark Smith :
I've been developing unit tests to increase the code coverage for pulldom, and
have discovered that comments and end_document do not appear to result in
events being obtained from the DOMEventStream.
I've attached a failing TestCase to demons
Mark Smith added the comment:
I have a patch that provides full documentation for pulldom, and adds sensible
docstrings to the pulldom module. I have unfortunately created the patch on the
py3k branch -- please let me know what I should do regarding porting these
changes to Python 2.7
15 matches
Mail list logo
